PURPOSE: To develop and test a fast ultrasonic molecular imaging technique for quantification and monitoring of angiogenesis in cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A new software algorithm measuring the dwell time of contrast microbubbles in near real-time (henceforth, fast method) was developed and integrated in a clinical ultrasound system. In vivo quantification and monitoring of tumor angiogenesis during anti-VEGF antibody therapy was performed in human colon cancer xenografts in mice (n=20) using the new fast method following administration of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2)-targeted contrast microbubbles. Imaging results were compared with a traditional destruction/replenishment approach (henceforth, traditional method) in an intra-animal comparison. RESULTS: There was excellent correlation (R(2)=0.93; P<0.001) between the fast method and the traditional method in terms of VEGFR2-targeted in vivo ultrasonic molecular imaging with significantly higher (P=0.002) imaging signal in colon cancer xenografts using VEGFR2-targeted compared to control non-targeted contrast microbubbles. The new fast method was highly reproducible (ICC=0.87). Following anti-angiogenic therapy, ultrasonic molecular imaging signal decreased by an average of 41±10%, whereas imaging signal increased by an average of 54±8% in non-treated tumors over a 72-hour period. Decreased VEGFR2 expression levels following anti-VEGF therapy were confirmed on ex vivo immunofluorescent staining. CONCLUSIONS: Fast ultrasonic molecular imaging based on dwell time microbubble signal measurements correlates well with the traditional measurement method, and allows reliable in vivo monitoring of anti-angiogenic therapy in human colon cancer xenografts. The improved work-flow afforded by the new quantification approach may facilitate clinical translation of ultrasonic molecular imaging.
PURPOSE: To develop and test a fast ultrasonic molecular imaging technique for quantification and monitoring of angiogenesis in cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A new software algorithm measuring the dwell time of contrast microbubbles in near real-time (henceforth, fast method) was developed and integrated in a clinical ultrasound system. In vivo quantification and monitoring of tumor angiogenesis during anti-VEGF antibody therapy was performed in humancolon cancer xenografts in mice (n=20) using the new fast method following administration of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2)-targeted contrast microbubbles. Imaging results were compared with a traditional destruction/replenishment approach (henceforth, traditional method) in an intra-animal comparison. RESULTS: There was excellent correlation (R(2)=0.93; P<0.001) between the fast method and the traditional method in terms of VEGFR2-targeted in vivo ultrasonic molecular imaging with significantly higher (P=0.002) imaging signal in colon cancer xenografts using VEGFR2-targeted compared to control non-targeted contrast microbubbles. The new fast method was highly reproducible (ICC=0.87). Following anti-angiogenic therapy, ultrasonic molecular imaging signal decreased by an average of 41±10%, whereas imaging signal increased by an average of 54±8% in non-treated tumors over a 72-hour period. Decreased VEGFR2 expression levels following anti-VEGF therapy were confirmed on ex vivo immunofluorescent staining. CONCLUSIONS: Fast ultrasonic molecular imaging based on dwell time microbubble signal measurements correlates well with the traditional measurement method, and allows reliable in vivo monitoring of anti-angiogenic therapy in humancolon cancer xenografts. The improved work-flow afforded by the new quantification approach may facilitate clinical translation of ultrasonic molecular imaging.
Authors: Carolin Sonne; Feng Xie; John Lof; Joseph Oberdorfer; Patrick Phillips; E Carr Everbach; Thomas R Porter Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Nirupama Deshpande; Amelie M Lutz; Ying Ren; Kira Foygel; Lu Tian; Michel Schneider; Reetesh Pai; Pankaj J Pasricha; Jürgen K Willmann Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-11-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Marybeth A Pysz; Kira Foygel; Cedric M Panje; Andrew Needles; Lu Tian; Jürgen K Willmann Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Howard Leong-Poi; Jonathan Christiansen; Alexander L Klibanov; Sanjiv Kaul; Jonathan R Lindner Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-01-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jürgen K Willmann; Ramasamy Paulmurugan; Kai Chen; Olivier Gheysens; Martin Rodriguez-Porcel; Amelie M Lutz; Ian Y Chen; Xiaoyuan Chen; Sanjiv S Gambhir Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-01-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Elizabeth B Herbst; Sunil Unnikrishnan; Shiying Wang; Alexander L Klibanov; John A Hossack; Frank William Mauldin Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Dongwoon Hyun; Lotfi Abou-Elkacem; Rakesh Bam; Leandra L Brickson; Carl D Herickhoff; Jeremy J Dahl Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2020-04-09 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Hua Zhang; Elizabeth S Ingham; M Karen J Gagnon; Lisa M Mahakian; Jingfei Liu; Josquin L Foiret; Juergen K Willmann; Katherine W Ferrara Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2016-11-21 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Shiying Wang; Elizabeth B Herbst; F William Mauldin; Galina B Diakova; Alexander L Klibanov; John A Hossack Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Jianhua Zhou; Huaijun Wang; Huiping Zhang; Amelie M Lutz; Lu Tian; Dimitre Hristov; Jürgen K Willmann Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 12.701