Literature DB >> 26112623

Contrast Ultrasound Imaging Does Not Affect Heat Shock Protein 70 Expression in Cholesterol-Fed Rabbit Aorta.

Brendon W Smith1, Douglas G Simpson1, Rita J Miller1, John W Erdman1, William D O'Brien2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Diagnostic ultrasound imaging is enhanced by the use of circulating microbubble contrast agents (UCAs), but the interactions between ultrasound, UCAs, and vascular tissue are not fully understood. We hypothesized that ultrasound with a UCA would stress the vascular tissue and increase levels of heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70), a cellular stress protein.
METHODS: Male New Zealand White rabbits (n = 32) were fed a standard chow diet (n = 4) or a 1% cholesterol, 10% fat, and 0.11% magnesium diet (n = 28). At 21 days, 24 rabbits on the cholesterol diet were either exposed to ultrasound (3.2-MHz f/3 transducer; 2.1 MPa; mechanical index, 1.17; 10 Hz pulse repetition frequency; 1.6 microseconds pulse duration; 2 minutes exposure duration at 4 sites along the aorta) with the UCA Definity (1× concentration, 1 mL/min; Lantheus Medical Imaging, North Billerica, MA) or sham exposed with a saline vehicle injection (n = 12 per group). Four rabbits on the cholesterol diet and 4 on the chow diet served as cage controls and were not exposed to ultrasound or restrained for blood sample collection. Animals were euthanized 24 hours after exposure, and aortas were quickly isolated and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Aorta lysates from the area of ultrasound exposure were analyzed for Hsp70 level by Western blot. Blood plasma was analyzed for cholesterol, Hsp70, and von Willebrand factor, a marker of endothelial function.
RESULTS: Plasma total cholesterol levels increased to an average of 705 mg/dL. Ultrasound did not affect plasma von Willebrand factor, plasma Hsp70, or aorta Hsp70. Restraint increased Hsp70 (P < .001, analysis of variance).
CONCLUSIONS: Restraint, but not ultrasound with the UCA or cholesterol feeding, significantly increased Hsp70.
© 2015 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atherosclerosis; cardiovascular disease; contrast agents; endothelium; heat shock protein 70; microbubbles; ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26112623      PMCID: PMC4494680          DOI: 10.7863/ultra.34.7.1209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  73 in total

Review 1.  Section 4--bioeffects in tissues with gas bodies. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Differences in definity and optison microbubble destruction rates at a similar mechanical index with different real-time perfusion systems.

Authors:  Carolin Sonne; Feng Xie; John Lof; Joseph Oberdorfer; Patrick Phillips; E Carr Everbach; Thomas R Porter
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 3.  Protein degradation and protection against misfolded or damaged proteins.

Authors:  Alfred L Goldberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Philip Greenland; Joseph S Alpert; George A Beller; Emelia J Benjamin; Matthew J Budoff; Zahi A Fayad; Elyse Foster; Mark A Hlatky; John McB Hodgson; Frederick G Kushner; Michael S Lauer; Leslee J Shaw; Sidney C Smith; Allen J Taylor; William S Weintraub; Nanette K Wenger; Alice K Jacobs
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  The safety of deFinity and Optison for ultrasound image enhancement: a retrospective analysis of 78,383 administered contrast doses.

Authors:  Kevin Wei; Sharon L Mulvagh; Lisa Carson; Ravin Davidoff; Ruvin Gabriel; Richard A Grimm; Stephanie Wilson; Lorrie Fane; Charles A Herzog; William A Zoghbi; Rhonda Taylor; Michael Farrar; Farooq A Chaudhry; Thomas R Porter; Waleed Irani; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 5.251

6.  Heat-shock response is associated with enhanced postischemic ventricular recovery.

Authors:  R W Currie; M Karmazyn; M Kloc; K Mailer
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Regulation of protein synthesis during heat shock.

Authors:  S Lindquist
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-09-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Expression and cellular distribution of heat-shock and nuclear oncogene proteins in rat hearts.

Authors:  L H Snoeckx; F Contard; J L Samuel; F Marotte; L Rappaport
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1991-11

9.  Effects of ultrasound and ultrasound contrast agent on vascular tissue.

Authors:  Steven C Wood; Sible Antony; Ronald P Brown; Jin Chen; Edward A Gordon; Victoria M Hitchins; Qin Zhang; Yunbo Liu; Subha Maruvada; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 2.062

10.  Low-pressure pulsed focused ultrasound with microbubbles promotes an anticancer immunological response.

Authors:  Hao-Li Liu; Han-Yi Hsieh; Li-An Lu; Chiao-Wen Kang; Ming-Fang Wu; Chun-Yen Lin
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.