Literature DB >> 22498299

Hollow silica and silica-boron nano/microparticles for contrast-enhanced ultrasound to detect small tumors.

Alexander Liberman1, H Paul Martinez, Casey N Ta, Christopher V Barback, Robert F Mattrey, Yuko Kono, Sarah L Blair, William C Trogler, Andrew C Kummel, Zhe Wu.   

Abstract

Diagnosing tumors at an early stage when they are easily curable and may not require systemic chemotherapy remains a challenge to clinicians. In order to improve early cancer detection, gas filled hollow boron-doped silica particles have been developed, which can be used for ultrasound-guided breast conservation therapy. The particles are synthesized using a polystyrene template and subsequently calcinated to create hollow, rigid nanoporous microspheres. The microshells are filled with perfluoropentane vapor. Studies were performed in phantoms to optimize particle concentration, injection dose, and the ultrasound settings such as pulse frequency and mechanical index. In vitro studies have shown that these particles can be continuously imaged by US up to 48 min and their signal lifetime persisted for 5 days. These particles could potentially be given by intravenous injection and, in conjunction with contrast-enhanced ultrasound, be utilized as a screening tool to detect smaller breast cancers before they are detectible by traditional mammography.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22498299      PMCID: PMC3588157          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  21 in total

Review 1.  Basic acoustic properties of microbubbles.

Authors:  Nico de Jong; Ayache Bouakaz; Peter Frinking
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.724

2.  Differences in definity and optison microbubble destruction rates at a similar mechanical index with different real-time perfusion systems.

Authors:  Carolin Sonne; Feng Xie; John Lof; Joseph Oberdorfer; Patrick Phillips; E Carr Everbach; Thomas R Porter
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 3.  Ultrasound molecular imaging.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Voigt
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 3.608

4.  Attaining negative margins in breast-conservation operations: is there a consensus among breast surgeons?

Authors:  Sarah L Blair; Kari Thompson; Joseph Rococco; Vanessa Malcarne; Peter D Beitsch; David W Ollila
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Biocompatibility, biodistribution, and drug-delivery efficiency of mesoporous silica nanoparticles for cancer therapy in animals.

Authors:  Jie Lu; Monty Liong; Zongxi Li; Jeffrey I Zink; Fuyuhiko Tamanoi
Journal:  Small       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 13.281

6.  Can contrast-enhanced sonography distinguish benign from malignant breast masses?

Authors:  P G Sorelli; D O Cosgrove; W E Svensson; N Zaman; K Satchithananda; N K Barrett; A K P Lim
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 0.910

Review 7.  Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Kari Tyne; Arpana Naik; Christina Bougatsos; Benjamin K Chan; Linda Humphrey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Radioactive seed localization of nonpalpable breast lesions is better than wire localization.

Authors:  Richard J Gray; Barbara A Pockaj; Patricia J Karstaedt; Michael C Roarke
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Secondary operations are frequently required to complete the surgical phase of therapy in the era of breast conservation and sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Philip S Mullenix; Daniel G Cuadrado; Scott R Steele; Matthew J Martin; Craig S See; Alan L Beitler; Preston L Carter
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost.

Authors:  Vittorio Corsetti; Nehmat Houssami; Aurora Ferrari; Marco Ghirardi; Sergio Bellarosa; Osvaldo Angelini; Claudio Bani; Pasquale Sardo; Giuseppe Remida; Enzo Galligioni; Stefano Ciatto
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 9.162

View more
  28 in total

1.  Self-assembled Targeting of Cancer Cells by Iron(III)-doped, Silica Nanoparticles.

Authors:  K K Pohaku Mitchell; S Sandoval; M J Cortes-Mateos; J G Alfaro; A C Kummel; W C Trogler
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 6.331

2.  Synthesis and surface functionalization of silica nanoparticles for nanomedicine.

Authors:  Alexander Liberman; Natalie Mendez; William C Trogler; Andrew C Kummel
Journal:  Surf Sci Rep       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 12.267

3.  Nonporous Silica Nanoparticles for Nanomedicine Application.

Authors:  Li Tang; Jianjun Cheng
Journal:  Nano Today       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 20.722

4.  Quantification of endocytosis using a folate functionalized silica hollow nanoshell platform.

Authors:  Sergio Sandoval; Natalie Mendez; Jesus G Alfaro; Jian Yang; Sharraya Aschemeyer; Alex Liberman; William C Trogler; Andrew C Kummel
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 5.  Prospects of nano-material in breast cancer management.

Authors:  A K Singh; A Pandey; M Tewari; R Kumar; A Sharma; H P Pandey; H S Shukla
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 3.201

6.  Iron(III)-doped, silica nanoshells: a biodegradable form of silica.

Authors:  Kristina K Pohaku Mitchell; Alexander Liberman; Andrew C Kummel; William C Trogler
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Exosome-like silica nanoparticles: a novel ultrasound contrast agent for stem cell imaging.

Authors:  Fang Chen; Ming Ma; Junxin Wang; Fang Wang; Shi-Xiong Chern; Eric Ruike Zhao; Anamik Jhunjhunwala; Sean Darmadi; Hangrong Chen; Jesse V Jokerst
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 7.790

8.  Color Doppler ultrasound and gamma imaging of intratumorally injected 500 nm iron-silica nanoshells.

Authors:  Alexander Liberman; Zhe Wu; Christopher V Barback; Robert Viveros; Sarah L Blair; Lesley G Ellies; David R Vera; Robert F Mattrey; Andrew C Kummel; William C Trogler
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 15.881

9.  Mechanically Tunable Hollow Silica Ultrathin Nanoshells for Ultrasound Contrast Agents.

Authors:  A Liberman; J Wang; N Lu; R D Viveros; C A Allen; R F Mattrey; S L Blair; W C Trogler; M J Kim; A C Kummel
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 18.808

10.  Indocyanine green modified silica shells for colon tumor marking.

Authors:  Adrian Garcia Badaracco; Erin Ward; Christopher Barback; Jian Yang; James Wang; Ching-Hsin Huang; Moon Kim; Qingxiao Wang; Seungjin Nam; Jonathan Delong; Sarah Blair; William C Trogler; Andrew Kummel
Journal:  Appl Surf Sci       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 6.707

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.