Literature DB >> 20236606

Improving sensitivity in ultrasound molecular imaging by tailoring contrast agent size distribution: in vivo studies.

Jason E Streeter1, Ryan Gessner, Iman Miles, Paul A Dayton.   

Abstract

Molecular imaging with ultrasound relies on microbubble contrast agents (MCAs) selectively adhering to a ligand-specific target. Prior studies have shown that only small quantities of microbubbles are retained at their target sites, therefore, enhancing contrast sensitivity to low concentrations of microbubbles is essential to improve molecular imaging techniques. In order to assess the effect of MCA diameter on imaging sensitivity, perfusion and molecular imaging studies were performed with microbubbles of varying size distributions. To assess signal improvement and MCA circulation time as a function of size and concentration, blood perfusion was imaged in rat kidneys using nontargeted size-sorted MCAs with a Siemens Sequoia ultrasound system (Siemans, Mountain View, CA) in cadence pulse sequencing (CPS) mode. Molecular imaging sensitivity improvements were studied with size-sorted alphavbeta3-targeted bubbles in both fibrosarcoma and R3230 rat tumor models. In perfusion imaging studies, video intensity and contrast persistence was approximately 8 times and approximately 3 times greater respectively, for "sorted 3-micron" MCAs (diameter, 3.3 +/- 1.95 microm) when compared to "unsorted" MCAs (diameter, 0.9 +/- 0.45 microm) at low concentrations. In targeted experiments, application of sorted 3-micron MCAs resulted in a approximately 20 times video intensity increase over unsorted populations. Tailoring size-distributions results in substantial imaging sensitivity improvement over unsorted populations, which is essential in maximizing sensitivity to small numbers of MCAs for molecular imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20236606      PMCID: PMC2945694     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1535-3508            Impact factor:   4.488


  29 in total

1.  Noninvasive ultrasound imaging of inflammation using microbubbles targeted to activated leukocytes.

Authors:  J R Lindner; J Song; F Xu; A L Klibanov; K Singbartl; K Ley; S Kaul
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-11-28       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Differences in definity and optison microbubble destruction rates at a similar mechanical index with different real-time perfusion systems.

Authors:  Carolin Sonne; Feng Xie; John Lof; Joseph Oberdorfer; Patrick Phillips; E Carr Everbach; Thomas R Porter
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 3.  Targeted ultrasonic contrast agents for molecular imaging and therapy.

Authors:  Gregory M Lanza; Samuel A Wickline
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.200

Review 4.  The role of ultrasound in molecular imaging.

Authors:  H-D Liang; M J K Blomley
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Radiation-force assisted targeting facilitates ultrasonic molecular imaging.

Authors:  Shukui Zhao; Mark Borden; Susannah H Bloch; Dustin Kruse; Katherine W Ferrara; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.488

6.  Ultrasonic imaging of tumor angiogenesis using contrast microbubbles targeted via the tumor-binding peptide arginine-arginine-leucine.

Authors:  Gregory E R Weller; Michael K K Wong; Ruth A Modzelewski; Erxiong Lu; Alexander L Klibanov; William R Wagner; Flordeliza S Villanueva
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Imaging tumor angiogenesis with contrast ultrasound and microbubbles targeted to alpha(v)beta3.

Authors:  Dilantha B Ellegala; Howard Leong-Poi; Joan E Carpenter; Alexander L Klibanov; Sanjiv Kaul; Mark E Shaffrey; Jiri Sklenar; Jonathan R Lindner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-30       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Noninvasive assessment of angiogenesis by ultrasound and microbubbles targeted to alpha(v)-integrins.

Authors:  Howard Leong-Poi; Jonathan Christiansen; Alexander L Klibanov; Sanjiv Kaul; Jonathan R Lindner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-01-28       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Dissolution of multicomponent microbubbles in the bloodstream: 2. Experiment.

Authors:  A Kabalnov; J Bradley; S Flaim; D Klein; T Pelura; B Peters; S Otto; J Reynolds; E Schutt; J Weers
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Contrast-enhanced US of microcirculation of superficially implanted tumors in rats.

Authors:  James E Chomas; Rachel E Pollard; Amy R Sadlowski; Stephen M Griffey; Erik R Wisner; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  56 in total

1.  Mapping microvasculature with acoustic angiography yields quantifiable differences between healthy and tumor-bearing tissue volumes in a rodent model.

Authors:  Ryan C Gessner; Stephen R Aylward; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Effect of surface architecture on in vivo ultrasound contrast persistence of targeted size-selected microbubbles.

Authors:  Cherry C Chen; Shashank R Sirsi; Shunichi Homma; Mark A Borden
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  An iterative fullwave simulation approach to multiple scattering in media with randomly distributed microbubbles.

Authors:  Aditya Joshi; Brooks D Lindsey; Paul A Dayton; Gianmarco Pinton; Marie Muller
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Modifying the size distribution of microbubble contrast agents for high-frequency subharmonic imaging.

Authors:  Himanshu Shekhar; Joshua J Rychak; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Ultrasound molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis with a neuropilin-1-targeted microbubble.

Authors:  Hua Zhang; Sarah Tam; Elizabeth S Ingham; Lisa M Mahakian; Chun-Yen Lai; Spencer K Tumbale; Tambet Teesalu; Neil E Hubbard; Alexander D Borowsky; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Assessment of the Superharmonic Response of Microbubble Contrast Agents for Acoustic Angiography as a Function of Microbubble Parameters.

Authors:  Isabel G Newsome; Thomas M Kierski; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Optimizing Sensitivity of Ultrasound Contrast-Enhanced Super-Resolution Imaging by Tailoring Size Distribution of Microbubble Contrast Agent.

Authors:  Fanglue Lin; James K Tsuruta; Juan D Rojas; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Contrast ultrasound imaging for identification of early responder tumor models to anti-angiogenic therapy.

Authors:  Shashank R Sirsi; Molly L Flexman; Fotois Vlachos; Jianzhong Huang; Sonia L Hernandez; Hyun Keol Kim; Tessa B Johung; Jeffrey W Gander; Ari R Reichstein; Brooke S Lampl; Antai Wang; Andreas H Hielscher; Jessica J Kandel; Darrell J Yamashiro; Mark A Borden
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  On the relationship between microbubble fragmentation, deflation and broadband superharmonic signal production.

Authors:  Brooks D Lindsey; Juan D Rojas; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Toward ultrasound molecular imaging with phase-change contrast agents: an in vitro proof of principle.

Authors:  Paul S Sheeran; Jason E Streeter; Lee B Mullin; Terry O Matsunaga; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.