Literature DB >> 14607164

Hemispheric specialization for spatial frequency processing in the analysis of natural scenes.

Carole Peyrin1, Alan Chauvin, Sylvie Chokron, Christian Marendaz.   

Abstract

Experimental data coming from visual cognitive sciences suggest that visual analysis starts with a parallel extraction of different visual attributes at different scales/frequencies. Neuropsychological and functional imagery data have suggested that each hemisphere (at the level of temporo-parietal junctions-TPJ) could play a key role in spatial frequency processing: The right TPJ should predominantly be involved in low spatial frequency (LFs) analysis and the left TPJ in high spatial frequency (HFs) analysis. Nevertheless, this functional hypothesis had been inferred from data obtained when using the hierarchical form paradigm, without any explicit spatial frequency manipulation per se. The aims of this research are (i) to investigate, in healthy subjects, the hemispheric asymmetry hypothesis with an explicit manipulation of spatial frequencies of natural scenes and (ii) to examine whether the 'precedence effect' (the relative rapidity of LFs and HFs processing) depends on the visual field of scene presentation or not. For this purpose, participants were to identify either non-filtered or LFs and HFs filtered target scene displayed either in the left, central, or right visual field. Results showed a hemispheric specialization for spatial frequency processing and different 'precedence effects' depending on the visual field of presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14607164     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00126-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  17 in total

1.  A theory of the visual system biology underlying development of spatial frequency lateralization.

Authors:  Mary F Howard; James A Reggia
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Visual field asymmetries in visual evoked responses.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Visual demand and visual field presentation influence natural scene processing.

Authors:  Olivier A Coubard; Céline Perez; Seta Kazandjian; Isabelle Gaudry; Christian Marendaz; Nathalie Guyader; Carole Peyrin; Sylvie Chokron
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Trees over forest: unpleasant stimuli compete for attention with global features.

Authors:  Kaisa M Hartikainen; Keith H Ogawa; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Laterality of quiet standing in old and young.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Kinsella-Shaw; Steven J Harrison; Claudia Carello; M T Turvey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Persistent hemispheric differences in the perceptual selection of spatial frequencies.

Authors:  Elise A Piazza; Michael A Silver
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The what and why of perceptual asymmetries in the visual domain.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Haruyuki Kojima
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-12-15

Review 8.  The neural bases of spatial frequency processing during scene perception.

Authors:  Louise Kauffmann; Stephen Ramanoël; Carole Peyrin
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-07

9.  Speeding up the brain: when spatial facilitation translates into latency shortening.

Authors:  Anne-Lise Paradis; Shasha Morel; Peggy Seriès; Jean Lorenceau
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Global interference during early visual processing: ERP evidence from a rapid global/local selective task.

Authors:  Virginie Beaucousin; Grégory Simon; Mathieu Cassotti; Arlette Pineau; Olivier Houdé; Nicolas Poirel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.