Literature DB >> 24666124

Persistent hemispheric differences in the perceptual selection of spatial frequencies.

Elise A Piazza1, Michael A Silver.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that the right hemisphere processes low spatial frequencies more efficiently than the left hemisphere, which preferentially processes high spatial frequencies. These studies have typically measured RTs to single, briefly flashed gratings and/or have directed observers to attend to a particular spatial frequency immediately before making a judgment about a subsequently presented stimulus. Thus, it is unclear whether the hemispheres differ in perceptual selection from multiple spatial frequencies that are simultaneously present in the environment, without bias from selective attention. Moreover, the time course of hemispheric asymmetry in spatial frequency processing is unknown. We addressed both of these questions with binocular rivalry, a measure of perceptual selection from competing alternatives over time. Participants viewed a pair of rivalrous orthogonal gratings with different spatial frequencies, presented either to the left or right of central fixation, and continuously reported which grating they perceived. At the beginning of a trial, the low spatial frequency grating was perceptually selected more often when presented in the left hemifield (right hemisphere) than in the right hemifield (left hemisphere), whereas the high spatial frequency grating showed the opposite pattern of results. This hemispheric asymmetry in perceptual selection persisted for the entire 30-sec stimulus presentation, continuing long after stimulus onset. These results indicate stable differences in the resolution of ambiguity across spatial locations and demonstrate the importance of considering sustained differences in perceptual selection across space when characterizing conscious representations of complex scenes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24666124      PMCID: PMC4374062          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  30 in total

1.  Visual hemispheric asymmetries depend on which spatial frequencies are task relevant.

Authors:  F L Kitterle; J B Hellige; S Christman
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not the detection, of low versus high spatial frequencies.

Authors:  F L Kitterle; S Christman; J B Hellige
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

3.  Cerebral regions and hemispheric specialization for processing spatial frequencies during natural scene recognition. An event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  Carole Peyrin; Monica Baciu; Christoph Segebarth; Christian Marendaz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Simple reaction time as a measure of the temporal response properties of transient and sustained channels.

Authors:  B G Breitmeyer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of absolute versus relative spatial frequency.

Authors:  S Christman; F L Kitterle; J Hellige
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Visual field effects in the discrimination of sine-wave gratings.

Authors:  F L Kitterle; L M Selig
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-07

7.  Attentional persistence for features of hierarchical patterns.

Authors:  L C Robertson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-09

8.  Asymmetric interference between components of suprathreshold compound gratings.

Authors:  H C Hughes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-10

9.  Spatial frequencies and the cerebral hemispheres: contrast sensitivity, visible persistence, and letter classification.

Authors:  D H Peterzell; L O Harvey; C D Hardyck
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-11

10.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?

Authors:  N K Logothetis; D A Leopold; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  5 in total

1.  Perception of differences in naturalistic dynamic scenes, and a V1-based model.

Authors:  Michelle P S To; Iain D Gilchrist; David J Tolhurst
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Individual differences in visual field shape modulate the effects of attention on the lower visual field advantage in crowding.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Michael A Silver; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Relative Spatial Frequency Processing Drives Hemispheric Asymmetry in Conscious Awareness.

Authors:  Elise A Piazza; Michael A Silver
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-19

4.  Investigating the Effectiveness of Spatial Frequencies to the Left and Right of Central Vision during Reading: Evidence from Reading Times and Eye Movements.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Victoria A McGowan; Stoyan Kurtev; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-18

5.  Commentary: A mental number line in human newborns.

Authors:  Arianna Felisatti; Jochen Laubrock; Samuel Shaki; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.