| Literature DB >> 23986728 |
Virginie Beaucousin1, Grégory Simon, Mathieu Cassotti, Arlette Pineau, Olivier Houdé, Nicolas Poirel.
Abstract
Visual perception depends on the integration of local elements of a visual scene into a global frame. Evidence from behavioral studies shows that (1) the detection of the global frame is faster than the detection of the local parts, a phenomenon called the global advantage, and that (2) an interference of the global shape is also present during local processing. Together, these effects are called the global precedence effect (GPE). Even if the global advantage appears to impact neural processing as early as the first 100 ms post-stimulus, previous studies failed to find a global interference effect before 200 ms post-stimulus. Using for the first time a rapid display of letter component stimuli during a global/local selective task in which conditions with perceptual conflict, congruent and incongruent conditions were considered, the present event-related potential (ERP) study shows a global interference effect occurring as early as the time range of the N1 component. In particular, only congruent stimuli elicited similar N1 amplitude during the global and local tasks, whereas an increased of the N1 amplitude during the global task was observed (as compared to the local task) for both stimuli with perceptual conflict and incongruent stimuli. This finding corroborates the recent neural models of human visual perception.Entities:
Keywords: ERP; N1; global interference effect; global processing; local processing
Year: 2013 PMID: 23986728 PMCID: PMC3753554 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00539
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Examples of stimuli.
Figure 2Experimental design. Each trial began with a central fixation point that lasted 500 ms. This fixation time was followed by the presentation of the compound stimuli, which was displayed for 40 ms on a black screen. The participants had to respond as quickly and accurately as possible by pressing a mouse button to report which of the two targets (“H” or “S”) they detected at the corresponding level. The response time (RT) was limited to 3000 ms (black screen). The inter-stimulus interval (ISI) was jittered between 600 and 1200 ms (black screen). All screens were black with white text or figure.
Figure 3Response time (RT) and standard deviation (SD) for correct answers.
Mean amplitudes for the different ERP components elicited on P7 and P8 electrodes according to the interference effect during the different tasks (± standard deviation).
| P1: 80–130 ms | Global | 0.5 ± 0.7 | 0.8 ± 1.2 | 0.6 ± 1.0 | 1.2 ± 1.2 | 2.0 ± 0.8 | 1.7 ± 0.9 |
| Local | 1.6 ± 1.2 | 0.8 ± 1.1 | 1.7 ± 0.9 | −0.3 ± 0.7 | 0.1 ± 0.8 | −0.01 ± 0.5 | |
| N1: 150–220 ms | Global | −6.8 ± 1.0 | −7.7 ± 1.0 | −7.4 ± 0.9 | −7.8 ± 1.1 | −8.5 ± 1.0 | −8.2 ± 1.0 |
| Local | −3.5 ± 1.0 | −2.2 ± 1.0 | −0.5 ± 1.0 | −5.8 ± 1.5 | −6.8 ± 1.3 | −6.0 ± 1.3 | |
Figure 4Grand average ERP waveforms for congruent (top), with perceptual conflict (middle) and incongruent stimuli (bottom) on P7 electrodes and differences between the N1 component elicited by global and local tasks for congruent, with perceptual conflict and incongruent stimuli projected on a 3D scalp from a posterior head view.