Literature DB >> 20168261

Trees over forest: unpleasant stimuli compete for attention with global features.

Kaisa M Hartikainen1, Keith H Ogawa, Robert T Knight.   

Abstract

Whether emotional distracters call for attentional resources has been discussed in several studies. We have earlier shown that brief unpleasant distracters captured right hemisphere (RH) attentional resources as evidenced with reduced event-related potential responses and increased reaction times to nonemotional left visual field/RH targets. The aim of this study was to investigate whether emotional distracters selectively interfere with processes predominantly relying on the RH such as processing global visual features. Evoked potentials were recorded from 18 participants carrying out a visual discrimination task engaging global RH and local left hemisphere-dependent processes. Unpleasant distracters reduced global target detection-related right parietal activity. We conclude that brief unpleasant distracters compete for RH attentional resources with global level processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20168261      PMCID: PMC2922681          DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328336eeb3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  22 in total

1.  Right hemisphere advantage for evaluating emotional facial expressions.

Authors:  G L Ahern; D L Schomer; J Kleefield; H Blume; G R Cosgrove; S Weintraub; M M Mesulam
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees?

Authors:  G R Fink; P W Halligan; J C Marshall; C D Frith; R S Frackowiak; R J Dolan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Mood and global-local visual processing.

Authors:  M R Basso; B K Schefft; M D Ris; W N Dember
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.892

4.  Regulation of attention to novel stimuli by frontal lobes: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  K R Daffner; M M Mesulam; L F Scinto; L G Cohen; B P Kennedy; W C West; P J Holcomb
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-03-30       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Subtraction in addition to addition: dual task performance improves when tasks are presented to separate hemispheres.

Authors:  J Liederman
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.475

6.  The role of spatial-frequency channels in the perception of local and global structure.

Authors:  G L Shulman; M A Sullivan; K Gish; W J Sakoda
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli.

Authors:  G R Fink; P W Halligan; J C Marshall; C D Frith; R S Frackowiak; R J Dolan
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions.

Authors:  M R Lamb; L C Robertson; R T Knight
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Right temporal-lobe contribution to global visual processing.

Authors:  J Doyon; B Milner
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Perceptual and conceptual information processing in schizophrenia and depression.

Authors:  E K Dreben; J H Fryer; D M McNair
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1995-04
View more
  6 in total

1.  Enhanced attention capture by emotional stimuli in mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Verónica Mäki-Marttunen; Venla Kuusinen; Maarja Brause; Jari Peräkylä; Markus Polvivaara; Rodolfo dos Santos Ribeiro; Juha Öhman; Kaisa M Hartikainen
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Task difficulty modulates brain activation in the emotional oddball task.

Authors:  Rachel E Siciliano; David J Madden; Catherine W Tallman; Maria A Boylan; Imke Kirste; Zachary A Monge; Lauren E Packard; Guy G Potter; Lihong Wang
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Low attentional engagement makes attention network activity susceptible to emotional interference.

Authors:  Verónica Mäki-Marttunen; Natasha Pickard; Anne-Kristin Solbakk; Keith H Ogawa; Robert T Knight; Kaisa M Hartikainen
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Human Brain Reacts to Transcranial Extraocular Light.

Authors:  Lihua Sun; Jari Peräkylä; Anselmi Kovalainen; Keith H Ogawa; Pekka J Karhunen; Kaisa M Hartikainen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Orbitofrontal Lesion Alters Brain Dynamics of Emotion-Attention and Emotion-Cognitive Control Interaction in Humans.

Authors:  Venla Kuusinen; Elena Cesnaite; Jari Peräkylä; Keith H Ogawa; Kaisa M Hartikainen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Threat-Modulation of Executive Functions-A Novel Biomarker of Depression?

Authors:  Jari Peräkylä; Kaija Järventausta; Piia Haapaniemi; Joan A Camprodon; Kaisa M Hartikainen
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.157

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.