Literature DB >> 10745302

Is there a difference between right and left femoral bone density?

A D Rao1, S Reddy, D S Rao.   

Abstract

Because of the known differences in bone mineral density (BMD) of the dominant and nondominant forearms, it has been customary to measure BMD of the nondominant forearm to reduce variance. However, it is less clear whether such systematic differences exist between BMD of the two hips. Accordingly, we measured BMD of both hips and the spine in 131 consecutive white women who presented to a community based private practitioner for evaluation and advice on osteoporosis. There was a highly significant correlation between BMD of the two hips at the femoral neck, trochanter, and Ward's triangle (r = 0.91, 0.93, and 0.89; p < 0.0001 for all three sites), and also between BMD at various measurement sites in the hip and the spine BMD (p < 0.0001). Although, there was no significant difference between the right and left femoral neck BMD, there were small (approximately 1-2.5%) but significant differences between BMD of the two hips at the trochanter and Ward's triangle (p = 0.008 and 0. 005, respectively). The left hip BMD was consistently higher than the right hip BMD at all measurement sites. Because of the small sample size of the left-handed persons, we were unable to determine the influence of dominant handedness on hip BMD. We concluded the following: (1) BMDs of the two hips are highly correlated at relevant measurement sites; (2) there does not appear to be a dominant hip as there is dominant forearm; (3) because of strong agreement between BMD of the two hips there is little justification to measure both hips in routine clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10745302     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:3:1:057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  10 in total

1.  Differences between the right and the left foot in calcaneal quantitative ultrasound measurements.

Authors:  Aydan Oral; Ayşe Yaliman; Dilşad Sindel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The prevalence of significant left-right differences in hip bone mineral density.

Authors:  R Hamdy; G M Kiebzak; E Seier; N B Watts
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Evaluation of the bone mineral density in the Mexican female population using the Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) technology.

Authors:  Rosales-Ortiz Sergio; Rivera García Elaín Nayelli
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Spatial distribution of hip cortical thickness in postmenopausal women with different osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Ming Ling; Xianlong Li; Yueyang Xu; Yongqian Fan
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  The diagnostic role of dual femur bone density measurement in low-impact fractures.

Authors:  Joseph C H Wong; Louise McEwan; Naomi Lee; Matthew R Griffiths; Nicholas A Pocock
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Bilateral variation in radial bone speed of sound.

Authors:  H Vrahoriti; J Damilakis; G Papadokostakis; A Hadjipavlou; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Prevalence and Risk Factors of Discordance between Left- and Right-Hip Bone Mineral Density Using DXA.

Authors:  Aziza Mounach; Asmaa Rezqi; Imad Ghozlani; Lahsen Achemlal; Ahmed Bezza; Abdellah El Maghraoui
Journal:  ISRN Rheumatol       Date:  2012-06-17

8.  Dominant vs. non-dominant hip comparison in bone mineral density in young sporting athletes.

Authors:  James A van Santen; Claudio Pereira; Maria T Sanchez-Santos; Cyrus Cooper; Nigel K Arden
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 2.617

9.  A 15-year follow-up study of hip bone mineral density and associations with leisure time physical activity. The Tromsø Study 2001-2016.

Authors:  Saija Mikkilä; Jonas Johansson; Anna Nordström; Peter Nordström; Nina Emaus; Bjørn Helge Handegård; Bente Morseth; Boye Welde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Study of the variations of fall induced hip fracture risk between right and left femurs using CT-based FEA.

Authors:  Tanvir R Faisal; Yunhua Luo
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 2.819

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.