Literature DB >> 16953374

Digital X-ray radiogrammetry better identifies osteoarthritis patients with a low bone mineral density than quantitative ultrasound.

Gerhard W Goerres1, Diana Frey, Thomas F Hany, Burkhardt Seifert, Hans Jörg Häuselmann, Annina Studer, Dagmar Hauser, Nathalie Zilic, Beat A Michel, Didier Hans, Daniel Uebelhart.   

Abstract

This study assessed the ability of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) to identify osteopenia and osteoporosis in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). One hundred and sixty-one patients with painful knee OA (81 men, 80 women; age 62.6+/-9.2 years, range 40-82 years) were included in this cross-sectional study and underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of both hips and the lumbar spine, QUS of the phalanges and calcanei of both hands and heels, and DXR using radiographs of both hands. Unpaired t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, ROC analysis and Spearman's rank correlation were used for comparisons and correlation of methods. Using DXA as the reference standard, we defined a low bone mineral density (BMD) as a T-score < or =-1.0 at the lumbar spine or proximal femur. In contrast to phalangeal or calcaneal QUS, DXR was able to discriminate patients with a low BMD at the lumbar spine (p<0.0001) or hips (p<0.0001). ROC analysis showed that DXR had an acceptable predictive power in identifying OA patients a low hip BMD (sensitivity 70%, specificity 71%). Therefore, DXR used as a screening tool could help in identifying patients with knee OA for DXA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16953374     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0382-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  38 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Differences between the right and the left foot in calcaneal quantitative ultrasound measurements.

Authors:  Aydan Oral; Ayşe Yaliman; Dilşad Sindel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Digital X-ray radiogrammetry combined with semiautomated analysis of joint space widths as a new diagnostic approach in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.

Authors:  J Böttcher; A Pfeil; A Rosholm; A Petrovitch; B E Seidl; A Malich; M L Schäfer; A Kramer; H J Mentzel; G Lehmann; G Hein; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2005-12

4.  Discriminatory ability of quantitative ultrasound parameters and bone mineral density in a population-based sample of postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures: results of the Basel Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  F Hartl; A Tyndall; M Kraenzlin; C Bachmeier; C Gückel; U Senn; D Hans; R Theiler
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Stiffness index identifies patients with osteoporotic fractures better than ultrasound velocity or attenuation alone.

Authors:  P Hadji; O Hars; C Wüster; K Bock; U S Alberts; H G Bohnet; G Emons; K D Schulz
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis by calcaneal ultrasound, metacarpal digital X-ray radiogrammetry and phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry: a comparative study.

Authors:  Steven Boonen; Jos Nijs; Herman Borghs; Herman Peeters; Dirk Vanderschueren; Frank P Luyten
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Influence of image-capturing parameters on digital X-ray radiogrammetry.

Authors:  Joachim Böttcher; Alexander Pfeil; Anders Rosholm; Ansgar Malich; Alexander Petrovitch; Bianka Heinrich; Gabriele Lehmann; Hans-Joachim Mentzel; Gert Hein; Werner Linss; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  The relationship between osteoarthritis and osteoporosis in the general population: the Chingford Study.

Authors:  D J Hart; I Mootoosamy; D V Doyle; T D Spector
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 10.  Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  Edward S Leib; E Michael Lewiecki; Neil Binkley; Ronald C Hamdy
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.