Literature DB >> 14578079

Secondary task difficulty modulates forward blocking in human contingency learning.

Jan De Houwer1, Tom Beckers.   

Abstract

The influence of a secondary task on forward blocking of human contingency ratings was examined. A smaller blocking effect was found when participants performed a highly demanding secondary task than when they performed a less demanding secondary task. The modulatory effect of secondary task difficulty was significant only when the secondary task was administered during both the learning and the test phase of the contingency judgement task. The results suggest that forward blocking in human contingency learning cannot be fully accounted for by associative processes. Instead, forward blocking seems to depend at least partially on deliberate deductive reasoning processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14578079     DOI: 10.1080/02724990244000296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B        ISSN: 0272-4995


  19 in total

1.  The effectiveness of inhibitors in human predictive judgments depends on the strength of the positive predictor.

Authors:  Danielle M Karazinov; Robert A Boakes
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 2.  Evidence for the role of higher order reasoning processes in cue competition and other learning phenomena.

Authors:  Jan De Houwer; Tom Beckers; Stefaan Vandorpe
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Competence and performance in causal learning.

Authors:  Michael R Waldmann; Jessica M Walker
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Nonnormative discounting: there is more to cue interaction effects than controlling for alternative causes.

Authors:  Kelly M Goedert; Barbara A Spellman
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Associative and causal reasoning accounts of causal induction: symmetries and asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic inferences.

Authors:  Francisco J López; Pedro L Cobos; Antonio Caño
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-12

Review 6.  Comparing associative, statistical, and inferential reasoning accounts of human contingency learning.

Authors:  Oskar Pineño; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Reasoning rats: forward blocking in Pavlovian animal conditioning is sensitive to constraints of causal inference.

Authors:  Tom Beckers; Ralph R Miller; Jan De Houwer; Kouji Urushihara
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-02

8.  A comparison of forward blocking and reduced overshadowing in human causal learning.

Authors:  Stefaan Vandorpe; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

9.  The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models.

Authors:  Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  A comparative approach to cue competition with one and two strong predictors.

Authors:  Irina Baetu; A G Baker; Christine Darredeau; Robin A Murphy
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.