Literature DB >> 16524015

A comparison of forward blocking and reduced overshadowing in human causal learning.

Stefaan Vandorpe1, Jan De Houwer.   

Abstract

In this study, we directly compared forward blocking with reduced overshadowing in a human causal learning study using an A+, B- (first learning stage), AX+, BY+, KL+ (second learning stage) design. The results showed that reduced overshadowing was significantly stronger than forward blocking. These results are problematic for at least some associative learning models but were predicted on the basis of higher order reasoning accounts of cue competition in human causal learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16524015     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  12 in total

1.  Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning.

Authors:  M R Waldmann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Re-examination of the role of within-compound associations in the retrospective revaluation of causal judgements.

Authors:  M R Aitken; M J Larkin; A Dickinson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2001-02

3.  Within-compound associations in retrospective revaluation and in direct learning: a challenge for comparator theory.

Authors:  Klaus G Melchers; Harald Lachnit; David R Shanks
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2004-01

4.  Spatial separation of target and competitor cues enhances blocking of human causality judgements.

Authors:  Steven Glautier
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2002-04

5.  Causal beliefs and conditioned responses: retrospective revaluation induced by experience and by instruction.

Authors:  Peter F Lovibond
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  A comparison of cue competition in a simple and a complex design.

Authors:  Stefaan Vandorpe; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2006-01-10

7.  Trial order affects cue interaction in contingency judgment.

Authors:  G B Chapman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Backward blocking and recovery from overshadowing in human causal judgement: the role of within-compound associations.

Authors:  E A Wasserman; L R Berglan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1998-05

9.  A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  J M Pearce; G Hall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Outcome and cue properties modulate blocking.

Authors:  Jan De Houwer; Tom Beckers; Steven Glautier
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2002-07
View more
  4 in total

1.  Revisiting the role of within-compound associations in cue-interaction phenomena.

Authors:  David Luque; Amanda Flores; Miguel A Vadillo
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  People want to see information that will help them make valid inferences in human causal learning.

Authors:  Stefaan Vandorpe; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07

3.  Further evidence for the role of inferential reasoning in forward blocking.

Authors:  Stefaan Vandorpe; Jan De Houwer; Tom Beckers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09

4.  Individual Differences in Discriminatory Fear Learning under Conditions of Ambiguity: A Vulnerability Factor for Anxiety Disorders?

Authors:  Inna Arnaudova; Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos; Marieke Effting; Yannick Boddez; Merel Kindt; Tom Beckers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.