Literature DB >> 16328226

Validity and interobserver agreement of a new radiographic grading system for intervertebral disc degeneration: Part I. Lumbar spine.

Hans-Joachim Wilke1, Friederike Rohlmann, Cornelia Neidlinger-Wilke, Karin Werner, Lutz Claes, Annette Kettler.   

Abstract

Many different radiographic grading systems for disc degeneration are described in literature. However, only a few of them are tested for interobserver agreement and none for validity. Furthermore, most of them are based on a subjective terminology. The aim of this study, therefore, is to combine these systems to a new one in which all subjective terms are replaced by more objective ones and to test this new system for validity and interobserver agreement. Since lumbar and cervical discs need to be graded differently, this study was divided into the present Part I for the lumbar and a Part II for the cervical spine. The new radiographic grading system covers the three variables "Height Loss", "Osteophyte Formation" and "Diffuse Sclerosis". On lateral and postero-anterior radiographs, each of these three variables first has to be graded individually. Then, the "Overall Degree of Degeneration" is assigned on a four-point scale from 0 (no degeneration) to 3 (severe degeneration). For validation, the radiographic degrees of degeneration of 44 lumbar discs were compared to the respective macroscopic ones, which were defined as "real" degrees of degeneration. The agreement between observers with different levels of experience was determined using the radiographs of 84 lumbar discs. Agreement was quantified using quadratic weighted Kappa coefficients (Kappa) with 95% confidence limits (95% CL). The validation of the new radiographic grading system revealed a substantial agreement between the radiographic and the "real" macroscopic overall degree of degeneration (Kappa=0.714, 95% CL: 0.587-0.841). The radiographic grades, however, tended to be slightly lower than the "real" ones. The interobserver agreement was substantial for all the three variables and for the overall degree of degeneration (Kappa=0.787, 95% CL: 0.702-0.872). However, the inexperienced observer tended to assign slightly lower degrees of degeneration than the experienced one. In conclusion, we believe that the new radiographic grading system is an almost objective, valid and reliable tool to quantify the degree of degeneration of individual lumbar intervertebral discs. However, the user should always remember that the "real" degree of degeneration tends to be underestimated and that slight differences between the ratings of observers with different levels of experience have to be expected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16328226      PMCID: PMC3489460          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-1029-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  26 in total

1.  Classification of age-related changes in lumbar intervertebral discs: 2002 Volvo Award in basic science.

Authors:  Norbert Boos; Sabine Weissbach; Helmut Rohrbach; Christoph Weiler; Kevin F Spratt; Andreas G Nerlich
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Interobserver error in interpretation of the radiographs for degeneration of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Sanjeev S Madan; Am Rai; John M Harley
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2003

3.  THE EVOLUTION OF DEGENERATIVE CHANGES IN THE CERVICAL SPINE AND AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE "JOINTS OF LUSCHKA".

Authors:  C E SILBERSTEIN
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1965 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Anatomical and clinical studies on lumbar disc degeneration.

Authors:  S FRIBERG; C HIRSCH
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1949

5.  Preliminary evaluation of a scheme for grading the gross morphology of the human intervertebral disc.

Authors:  J P Thompson; R H Pearce; M T Schechter; M E Adams; I K Tsang; P B Bishop
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Correlation of radiographic and MRI parameters to morphological and biochemical assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration.

Authors:  Lorin M Benneker; Paul F Heini; Suzanne E Anderson; Mauro Alini; Keita Ito
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The stages of disc degeneration as revealed by discograms.

Authors:  M A Adams; P Dolan; W C Hutton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1986-01

8.  Disc degeneration affects the multidirectional flexibility of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  M Mimura; M M Panjabi; T R Oxland; J J Crisco; I Yamamoto; A Vasavada
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Radiological prevalence of lumbar intervertebral disc calcification in the elderly: an autopsy study.

Authors:  X G Cheng; P Brys; J Nijs; P Nicholson; Y Jiang; A L Baert; J Dequeker
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Reliability of new indices of radiographic osteoarthritis of the hand and hip and lumbar disc degeneration.

Authors:  N E Lane; M C Nevitt; H K Genant; M C Hochberg
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.666

View more
  54 in total

1.  Age-related changes in human cervical, thoracal and lumbar intervertebral disc exhibit a strong intra-individual correlation.

Authors:  C Weiler; M Schietzsch; T Kirchner; A G Nerlich; N Boos; K Wuertz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2006.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; J Drumm; K Häussler; C Mack; W-I Steudel; A Kettler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Morphometric analysis of the relationships between intervertebral disc and vertebral body heights: an anatomical and radiographic study of the human thoracic spine.

Authors:  Maria E Kunkel; Andrea Herkommer; Michael Reinehr; Tobias M Böckers; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Intervertebral disc lesions: visualisation with ultra-high field MRI at 11.7 T.

Authors:  Nikolaus Berger-Roscher; Fabio Galbusera; Volker Rasche; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Ageing and degenerative changes of the intervertebral disc and their impact on spinal flexibility.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Marc van Rijsbergen; Keita Ito; Jacques M Huyghe; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Evaluation of a new approach to compute intervertebral disc height measurements from lateral radiographic views of the spine.

Authors:  Brett T Allaire; M Clara DePaolis Kaluza; Alexander G Bruno; Elizabeth J Samelson; Douglas P Kiel; Dennis E Anderson; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Which factors prognosticate rotational instability following lumbar laminectomy?

Authors:  Arno Bisschop; Idsart Kingma; Ronald L A W Bleys; Albert J van der Veen; Cornelis P L Paul; Jaap H van Dieën; Barend J van Royen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Spine patient outcomes research trial: radiographic predictors of clinical outcomes after operative or nonoperative treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Adam M Pearson; Jon D Lurie; Emily A Blood; John W Frymoyer; Heike Braeutigam; Howard An; Federico P Girardi; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Impact of the quantity of intradiscal cement leak on the progression of intervertebral disc degeneration.

Authors:  B Jamjoom; S Patel; R Bommireddy; Z Klezl
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.