Literature DB >> 19707703

Bone mineral density reference ranges for Australian men: Geelong Osteoporosis Study.

M J Henry1, J A Pasco, S Korn, J E Gibson, M A Kotowicz, G C Nicholson.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: A large population-based random sample of Australian white men was used to provide normative bone mineral density (BMD) data at multiple anatomical sites. The femoral neck BMD data are very similar to those obtained in USA non-Hispanic white males participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES III). The reference ranges will be suitable for similar populations.
INTRODUCTION: To provide normative BMD data for Australian men derived from a large population-based random sample.
METHODS: An age-stratified random sample of men was recruited from the Australian electoral rolls (n = 1,467 aged 20-97 years). BMD was quantified at multiple sites using Lunar densitometers.
RESULTS: Age-related differences in BMD were best predicted by linear relationships at the spine and hip and by quadratic functions at the whole body and forearm. At the spine, a small age-related increase in mean BMD was observed. Although in the subset with no spinal abnormalities, there was a decrease of 0.003 g/cm(2) per year from age 20. At the hip sites, mean BMD decreased at 0.001-0.006 g/cm(2) per year from age 20. At the forearm and whole body, BMD peaked at 41-47 years. Apart from a small difference in men greater than or equal to 80 years, the Australian femoral neck BMD data are not different to those obtained in USA non-Hispanic white males participating in NHANES III and were generally similar to those of large studies from Canada (CaMos) and Spain.
CONCLUSIONS: These data supply BMD reference ranges at multiple anatomical sites that will be applicable to white Australian men and similar populations such as USA non-Hispanic white men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19707703     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-1042-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  22 in total

1.  Bone mineral content in women: trends of change.

Authors:  H Düppe; P Gärdsell; O Johnell; B E Nilsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Bone mineral density in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  A Stewart; A J Black
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Peak bone mass of Iranian population: the Iranian Multicenter Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  Bagher Larijani; Alireza Moayyeri; Abbas Ali Keshtkar; Arash Hossein-Nezhad; Akbar Soltani; Amir Bahrami; Gholam Hossein Omrani; Reza Rajabian; Iraj Nabipour
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Clinical utility of spine bone density in elderly women.

Authors:  Diane L Schneider; Ricki Bettencourt; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  Do Australian women have greater spinal bone density than North American women?

Authors:  L Flicker; R Green; B Kaymakci; M Lichtenstein; G Buirski; J D Wark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Factors associated with the lumbar spine and proximal femur bone mineral density in older men.

Authors:  Jane A Cauley; Robin L Fullman; Katie L Stone; Joseph M Zmuda; Douglas C Bauer; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Kristine Ensrud; Edith M C Lau; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).

Authors:  A Tenenhouse; L Joseph; N Kreiger; S Poliquin; T M Murray; L Blondeau; C Berger; D A Hanley; J C Prior
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Facet joint osteoarthritis and low back pain in the community-based population.

Authors:  Leonid Kalichman; Ling Li; David H Kim; Ali Guermazi; Valery Berkin; Christopher J O'Donnell; Udo Hoffmann; Rob Cole; David J Hunter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Geographical variation in DXA bone mineral density in young European men and women. Results from the Network in Europe on Male Osteoporosis (NEMO) study.

Authors:  Stephen Kaptoge; Jose A da Silva; Kim Brixen; David M Reid; Heikki Kröger; Torben L Nielsen; Marianne Andersen; Claus Hagen; Roman Lorenc; Steven Boonen; Marie-Christine de Vernejoul; Jan J Stepan; Judith Adams; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Jonathan Reeve
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Prevalence of osteoporosis in Australian women: Geelong Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  M J Henry; J A Pasco; G C Nicholson; E Seeman; M A Kotowicz
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  30 in total

1.  Rates of bone loss in young adult males.

Authors:  Bonny L Specker; Howard E Wey; Eric P Smith
Journal:  Int J Clin Rheumtol       Date:  2010-04-01

2.  Calcaneal ultrasound reference ranges for Australian men and women: the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  H Gould; S L Brennan; G C Nicholson; M A Kotowicz; M J Henry; J A Pasco
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Independent external validation of nomograms for predicting risk of low-trauma fracture and hip fracture.

Authors:  Lisa Langsetmo; Tuan V Nguyen; Nguyen D Nguyen; Christopher S Kovacs; Jerilynn C Prior; Jacqueline R Center; Suzanne Morin; Robert G Josse; Jonathan D Adachi; David A Hanley; John A Eisman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Prevalence of vertebral fracture and densitometric osteoporosis in Spanish adult men: The Camargo Cohort Study.

Authors:  José M Olmos; José L Hernández; Josefina Martínez; Emilio Pariente; Jesús Castillo; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra; Jesús González-Macías
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Patterns of treatment in Australian men following fracture.

Authors:  R Otmar; M J Henry; M A Kotowicz; G C Nicholson; S Korn; J A Pasco
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  How well do the FRAX (Australia) and Garvan calculators predict incident fractures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  K L Holloway-Kew; Y Zhang; A G Betson; K B Anderson; D Hans; N K Hyde; G C Nicholson; N A Pocock; M A Kotowicz; J A Pasco
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  The trabecular bone score is associated with bone mineral density, markers of bone turnover and prevalent fracture in patients with end stage kidney disease.

Authors:  J Aleksova; S Kurniawan; G J Elder
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Fracture risk among older men: osteopenia and osteoporosis defined using cut-points derived from female versus male reference data.

Authors:  J A Pasco; S E Lane; S L Brennan; E N Timney; G Bucki-Smith; A G Dobbins; G C Nicholson; M A Kotowicz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Predictors of the rate of BMD loss in older men: findings from the CHAMP study.

Authors:  K Bleicher; R G Cumming; V Naganathan; M J Seibel; F M Blyth; D G Le Couteur; D J Handelsman; H M Creasey; L M Waite
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Peak bone mass from longitudinal data: implications for the prevalence, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Claudie Berger; David Goltzman; Lisa Langsetmo; Lawrence Joseph; Stuart Jackson; Nancy Kreiger; Alan Tenenhouse; K Shawn Davison; Robert G Josse; Jerilynn C Prior; David A Hanley
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.