Literature DB >> 16172902

Review of existing grading systems for cervical or lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration.

Annette Kettler1, Hans-Joachim Wilke.   

Abstract

The aim of this literature review was to present and to evaluate all grading systems for cervical and lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration, which are accessible from the MEDLINE database. A MEDLINE search was conducted to select all articles presenting own grading systems for cervical or lumbar disc or facet joint degeneration. To give an overview, these grading systems were listed systematically depending on the spinal region they refer to and the methodology used for grading. All systems were checked for reliability tests and those recommended for use having an interobserver Kappa or Intraclass Correlation Coefficient >0.60 if disc degeneration was graded and >0.40 if facet joint degeneration was graded. MEDLINE search revealed 42 different grading systems. Thirty of these were used to grade lumbar spine degeneration, ten were used to grade cervical spine degeneration and two were used to grade both. Thus, the grading systems for the lumbar spine represented the vast majority of all 42 grading systems. Interobserver reliability tests were found for 12 grading systems. Based on their Kappa or Intraclass Correlation Coefficients nine of these could be recommended for use and three could not. All other systems could neither be recommended nor not be recommended since reliability tests were missing. These systems should therefore first be tested before use. The design of the grading systems varied considerably. Five grading systems were beginning with the lowest degree of degeneration, 37, however, with the normal, not degenerated state. A 5-grade scale was used in six systems, a 4-grade scale in 24, a 3-grade scale in eight and a 2-grade scale in three systems. In 15 cases the normal, not degenerated state was assigned to "grade 0", in another 15 cases, however, this state was assigned to "grade 1". This wide variety in the design of the grading systems makes comparisons difficult and may easily lead to confusion. We would therefore recommend to define certain standards. Our suggestion would be to use a scale of three to five grades, to begin the scale with the not degenerated state and to assign this state to "grade 0".

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16172902      PMCID: PMC3489462          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0954-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  61 in total

1.  1990 Volvo Award in experimental studies. Anulus tears and intervertebral disc degeneration. An experimental study using an animal model.

Authors:  O L Osti; B Vernon-Roberts; R D Fraser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Interobserver error in interpretation of the radiographs for degeneration of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Sanjeev S Madan; Am Rai; John M Harley
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2003

3.  Lumbar intradiscal pressure. Experimental studies on post-mortem material.

Authors:  A NACHEMSON
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1960

4.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Fluid content of the nucleus pulposus as a factor in the disk syndrome; preliminary report.

Authors:  A NAYLOR; D L SMARE
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1953-10-31

6.  Anatomical and clinical studies on lumbar disc degeneration.

Authors:  S FRIBERG; C HIRSCH
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1949

7.  Cervical discogenic pain. Prospective correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and discography in asymptomatic subjects and pain sufferers.

Authors:  K P Schellhas; M D Smith; C R Gundry; S R Pollei
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Disc degeneration affects the multidirectional flexibility of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  M Mimura; M M Panjabi; T R Oxland; J J Crisco; I Yamamoto; A Vasavada
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Lumbar facet joint tropism does not accelerate degeneration of the facet joints.

Authors:  J Grogan; B H Nowicki; T A Schmidt; V M Haughton
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Histological changes in aging lumbar intervertebral discs. Their role in protrusions and prolapses.

Authors:  T Yasuma; S Koh; T Okamura; Y Yamauchi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  91 in total

Review 1.  The lumbar facet joint: a review of current knowledge: part 1: anatomy, biomechanics, and grading.

Authors:  Gerard P Varlotta; Todd R Lefkowitz; Mark Schweitzer; Thomas J Errico; Jeffrey Spivak; John A Bendo; Leon Rybak
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Age-related changes in human cervical, thoracal and lumbar intervertebral disc exhibit a strong intra-individual correlation.

Authors:  C Weiler; M Schietzsch; T Kirchner; A G Nerlich; N Boos; K Wuertz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  T1ρ magnetic resonance imaging quantification of early lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Bruno Beomonte Zobel; Gianluca Vadalà; Riccardo Del Vescovo; Sofia Battisti; Francesca Maria Martina; Luigi Stellato; Emanuele Leoncini; Arijitt Borthakur; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Bilateral Pars Defects at the L4 Vertebra Result in Increased Degeneration When Compared With Those at L5: An Anatomic Study.

Authors:  Peter T McCunniff; HoJun Yoo; Anthony Dugarte; Navkirat S Bajwa; Jason O Toy; Uri M Ahn; Nicholas U Ahn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2006.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Validity and interobserver agreement of a new radiographic grading system for intervertebral disc degeneration: Part I. Lumbar spine.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; Friederike Rohlmann; Cornelia Neidlinger-Wilke; Karin Werner; Lutz Claes; Annette Kettler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  MRI of degenerative lumbar spine disease: comparison of non-accelerated and parallel imaging.

Authors:  Ingo Nölte; Lars Gerigk; Marc A Brockmann; André Kemmling; Christoph Groden
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Differential patient responses to spinal manipulative therapy and their relation to spinal degeneration and post-treatment changes in disc diffusion.

Authors:  Arnold Y L Wong; Eric C Parent; Sukhvinder S Dhillon; Narasimha Prasad; Dino Samartzis; Gregory N Kawchuk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  A statistical model for intervertebral disc degeneration: determination of the optimal T2 cut-off values.

Authors:  S A Nagy; I Juhasz; H Komaromy; K Pozsar; I Zsigmond; G Perlaki; G Orsi; A Schwarcz; N Walter; T Doczi; P Bogner
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.649

10.  Which factors prognosticate rotational instability following lumbar laminectomy?

Authors:  Arno Bisschop; Idsart Kingma; Ronald L A W Bleys; Albert J van der Veen; Cornelis P L Paul; Jaap H van Dieën; Barend J van Royen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.