Literature DB >> 14569455

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous upper or lower abdominal surgery.

A J Karayiannakis1, A Polychronidis, S Perente, S Botaitis, C Simopoulos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous abdominal surgery has been reported as a relative contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study specifically examined the effect of previous intraabdominal surgery on the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS: Data from 1,638 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were reviewed and analyzed for open conversion rates, operative times, intra- and postoperative complications, and hospital stay.
RESULTS: Of the 1,638 study patients 473 (28.9%) had undergone previous abdominal surgery: 58 upper and 415 lower abdominal operations. The 262 patients who had undergone only a previous appendectomy were excluded from further analysis. Adhesions were found in 70.7%, 58.8% and 2.1% of patients respectively, who had previous upper, lower or no previous abdominal surgery with adhesiolysis required, respectively, in 78%, 30% and 0% of these cases. There were no complications directly attributable to adhesiolysis. Patients with previous upper abdominal surgery had a longer operating time (66.4 +/- 34.2 min), a higher open conversion rate (19%), a higher incidence of postoperative wound infection (5.2%), and a longer postoperative stay (3.4 +/- 2.1 days) than those who had undergone previous lower abdominal surgery (50.8 +/- 24 min, 3.3%, 0.7%, and 2.6 +/- 1.4 days, respectively) and those without prior abdominal surgery (47.4 +/- 25.6 min, 5.4%, 1.2%, and 2.8 +/- 1.9 days, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Previous abdominal operations, even in the upper abdomen, are not a contraindication to safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, previous upper abdominal surgery is associated with an increased need for adhesiolysis, a higher open conversion rate, a prolonged operating time, an increased incidence of postoperative wound infection, and a longer postoperative stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14569455     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-9001-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

1.  The ultrasonic localization of abdominal wall adhesions.

Authors:  J A Caprini; J A Arcelus; J Swanson; R Coats; K Hoffman; J J Brosnan; S Blattner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the densely scarred abdomen.

Authors:  S S Kumar
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Risks of the minimal access approach for laparoscopic surgery: multivariate analysis of morbidity related to umbilical trocar insertion.

Authors:  J Mayol; J Garcia-Aguilar; E Ortiz-Oshiro; J A De-Diego Carmona; J A Fernandez-Represa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Laparoscopic access with a visualizing trocar.

Authors:  J S Wolf
Journal:  Tech Urol       Date:  1997

5.  Comparison of transperitoneal laparoscopic access techniques: Optiview visualizing trocar and Veress needle.

Authors:  R Marcovich; M A Del Terzo; J S Wolf
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Urologic laparoscopy with a new blunt-tipped trocar: safe, rapid access without the use of fascial sutures.

Authors:  D A Ohl; G J Faerber; W W Hurd
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients who have had previous abdominal surgery.

Authors:  K Miller; N Hölbling; J Hutter; W Junger; E Moritz; T Speil
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Do preoperative factors predict the need to convert to open?

Authors:  C H Hutchinson; L W Traverso; F T Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopy using the left upper quadrant as the primary trocar site.

Authors:  J M Childers; P R Brzechffa; E A Surwit
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  The feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous abdominal surgery.

Authors:  J Diez; R Delbene; A Ferreres
Journal:  HPB Surg       Date:  1998
View more
  43 in total

1.  Multivariable analysis of cholecystectomy after gastrectomy: laparoscopy is a feasible initial approach even in the presence of common bile duct stones or acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Joohyun Kim; Jeong Nam Cho; Sun Hyung Joo; Bum Soo Kim; Sang Mok Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome.

Authors:  Benjie Tang; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Laparoscopic kidney donation: The impact of adhesions.

Authors:  Niels F M Kok; J B C van der Wal; Ian P J Alwayn; Khe T C Tran; Jan N M IJzermans
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Effects of prior abdominal surgery on laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Deniz Atasoy; Afag Aghayeva; İpek Sapcı; Onur Bayraktar; Turgut Bora Cengiz; Bilgi Baca
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2018-08-28

Review 5.  Biliary complications secondary to post-cholecystectomy clip migration: a review of 69 cases.

Authors:  Vui Heng Chong; Chee Fui Chong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with a history of gastrectomy.

Authors:  Akira Sasaki; Jun Nakajima; Hiroyuki Nitta; Toru Obuchi; Shigeaki Baba; Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Reoperation of biliary tract by laparoscopy: experiences with 39 cases.

Authors:  Li-Bo Li; Xiu-Jun Cai; Yi-Ping Mou; Qi Wei
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous upper abdominal operations.

Authors:  Keong Won Yun; Young Joon Ahn; Hae Won Lee; In Mok Jung; Jung Kee Chung; Seung Chul Heo; Ki-Tae Hwang; Hye Seong Ahn
Journal:  Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2012-11-30

9.  Conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy after gastric resection: a 15-year review.

Authors:  Shannon A Fraser; Harvey Sigman
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Hybrid transileocecal portal vein embolization associated with staging laparoscopy for planned major hepatectomy in advanced hepatobiliary cancers.

Authors:  Yasunari Kawabata; Hikota Hayashi; Rika Yoshida; Shinji Ando; Kosuke Nakamura; Takeshi Nishi; Megumi Nakamura; Yoshitsugu Tajima
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.