Literature DB >> 30216161

Effects of prior abdominal surgery on laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Deniz Atasoy1, Afag Aghayeva1, İpek Sapcı2, Onur Bayraktar1, Turgut Bora Cengiz2, Bilgi Baca1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: With increased experience and technological advancement, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is reported to be safe and feasible even in the presence of most of the previously recognized contraindications. The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of prior upper and lower abdominal surgery on laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of all sequential patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy from January 2014 to June 2016 was conducted. Patients were divided into three groups (Group A: patients without any prior abdominal surgical procedures; Group B: patients with prior upper abdominal surgical procedures; and Group C: patients with prior lower abdominal surgical procedures).
RESULTS: A total of 329 patients were assessed. Group A consisted of 223, Group B of 18, and Group C of 88 patients. A statistically significantly higher operative time, postoperative pain, and complication rate after laparoscopic cholecystectomy were noted in patients with prior upper abdominal surgery. The groups were comparable regarding patients' demographics and surgery indications. The length of hospital stay was not statistically different between the groups (p=0.065).
CONCLUSION: According to the results of the current study, prior upper abdominal surgery leads to a significantly longer procedure time, higher postoperative pain, and complication rates after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, the length of hospital stay was not affected by the parameters investigated.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30216161      PMCID: PMC6173592          DOI: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Surg        ISSN: 2564-6850


  11 in total

1.  Reasons for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: a 10-year review.

Authors:  Juliane Bingener-Casey; Melanie L Richards; William E Strodel; Wayne H Schwesinger; Kenneth R Sirinek
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

3.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 4.  Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Federico Coccolini; Fausto Catena; Michele Pisano; Federico Gheza; Stefano Fagiuoli; Salomone Di Saverio; Gioacchino Leandro; Giulia Montori; Marco Ceresoli; Davide Corbella; Massimo Sartelli; Michael Sugrue; Luca Ansaloni
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 6.071

5.  Open abdominal surgery: a risk factor for future laparoscopic surgery?

Authors:  Shiva Seetahal; Augustine Obirieze; Edward E Cornwell; Terrence Fullum; Daniel Tran
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous upper or lower abdominal surgery.

Authors:  A J Karayiannakis; A Polychronidis; S Perente; S Botaitis; C Simopoulos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Effects of previous abdominal surgery incision type on complications and conversion rate in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Metin Ercan; Erdal Birol Bostanci; Murat Ulas; Ilter Ozer; Yusuf Ozogul; Canbek Seven; Fuat Atalay; Musa Akoglu
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.719

8.  Time trend and variability of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstone disease.

Authors:  Mario Saia; Domenico Mantoan; Alessandra Buja; Chiara Bertoncello; Tatjana Baldovin; Giampietro Callegaro; Vincenzo Baldo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Comparative quality of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in the elderly using propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Kazuaki Kuwabara; Shinya Matsuda; Koichi Benjamin Ishikawa; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Kenji Fujimori
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 2.260

10.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Nusret Akyurek; Bülent Salman; Oktay Irkorucu; Oge Tascilar; Osman Yuksel; Mustafa Sare; Ertan Tatlicioglu
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  2 in total

1.  Is Previous Upper Abdominal Surgery a Contraindication for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Mehmet Kağan Katar; Pamir Eren Ersoy
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-04-03

2.  Therapeutic experience of an 89-year-old high-risk patient with incarcerated cholecystolithiasis: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Zong-Ming Zhang; Chong Zhang; Zhuo Liu; Li-Min Liu; Ming-Wen Zhu; Yue Zhao; Bai-Jiang Wan; Hai Deng; Hai-Yan Yang; Jia-Hong Liao; Hong-Yan Zhu; Xue Wen; Li-Li Liu; Man Wang; Xiao-Ting Ma; Miao-Miao Zhang; Jiao-Jiao Liu; Tian-Tian Liu; Niu-Niu Huang; Pei-Ying Yuan; Yu-Jiao Gao; Jing Zhao; Xi-Ai Guo; Fang Liao; Feng-Yuan Li; Xue-Ting Wang; Rui-Jiao Yuan; Fang Wu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 1.337

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.