Literature DB >> 7597599

The ultrasonic localization of abdominal wall adhesions.

J A Caprini1, J A Arcelus, J Swanson, R Coats, K Hoffman, J J Brosnan, S Blattner.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic candidates with abdominal scars may have adhesions that result in visceral injury during trocar insertion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of preoperative ultrasound mapping of abdominal wall adhesions, to provide safe initial laparoscopic access, and to guide the placement of subsequent trocars, facilitating adhesolysis when necessary. Thirty consecutive patients with previous abdominal surgery who were scheduled for laparoscopy underwent a preoperative ultrasonic examination of the abdominal wall using a 7-MHz linear ultrasound probe. Spontaneous viscera slide was measured during longitudinal scanning (normal = 2-5 cm) and induced viscera slide was evaluated during longitudinal and transverse scanning (normal = 1 cm or more) over the existing abdominal scar, the peri-umbilical region, and the remaining abdominal quadrants. Sixteen (53%) of 30 patients had adhesions under their scar and only four patients (25%) had umbilical adhesions. The 12 patients without umbilical adhesions all had successful closed cannulation while open cannulation at alternate sites was successful in the four individuals with umbilical adhesions. Blind umbilical needle cannulation was successfully done in all of the remaining 14 patients (47%) without visceral injury, including three patients (21%) with upper abdominal scars who were adhesion-free elsewhere. No adhesions were encountered that had not been preoperatively predicted by ultrasound. We conclude that examination of the abdominal wall with spontaneous and induced viscera slide, using ultrasound scanning, can reliably detect intraabdominal adhesions. The examination is best done on a highly selective basis by the operating surgeon to guide the location for initial trocar insertion and determine the type of abdominal wall cannulation in those individuals with previous abdominal scars.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7597599     DOI: 10.1007/BF00187769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  6 in total

1.  Ultrasonic detection of viscera slide as an indicator of abdominal wall adhesions.

Authors:  I Kodama; L A Loiacono; B Sigel; J Machi; R M Golub; R E Parsons; J Justin; H A Zaren; A K Sachdeva
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.910

2.  Open laparoscopy vs. closed laparoscopy: a comparison of complication rates.

Authors:  H M Hasson
Journal:  Adv Plan Parent       Date:  1978

3.  Risks and prophylaxis in laparoscopy: a survey of 100,000 cases.

Authors:  M Mintz
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 0.142

4.  Prelaparoscopic echography used to detect abdominal adhesions.

Authors:  G Marin; S Bergamo; E Miola; M W Caldironi; G Dagnini
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Open laparoscopy: a report of 150 cases.

Authors:  H M Hasson
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 0.142

6.  Previous abdominal surgery as a risk factor in interval laparoscopic sterilization.

Authors:  I Chi; P J Feldblum; S A Balogh
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-04-01       Impact factor: 8.661

  6 in total
  19 in total

1.  Detection of peritoneal adhesions using ultrasound examination for the evaluation of an innovative intraperitoneal mesh.

Authors:  C Aubé; P Pessaux; J J Tuech; R du Plessis; P Becker; C Caron; J P Arnaud
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Noninvasive detection and mapping of intraabdominal adhesions: a review of the current literature.

Authors:  Nellie Bering Zinther; Jens Fedder; Hans Friis-Andersen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopy for acute small bowel obstruction: indication or contraindication?

Authors:  Ioannis Tierris; Constantinos Mavrantonis; Constantinos Stratoulias; George Panousis; Afrodite Mpetsou; Nicolaos Kalochristianakis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  The role of non-invasive imaging techniques in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jonas Gerner-Rasmussen; Anders Meller Donatsky; Flemming Bjerrum
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  B Kirshtein; A Roy-Shapira; L Lantsberg; E Avinoach; S Mizrahi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Laparoscopic intestinal injury: a review and case presentation.

Authors:  A Ostrzenski
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  Cine magnetic resonance imaging vs high-resolution ultrasonography for detection of adhesions after laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair: a matched pair pilot analysis.

Authors:  T Mussack; T Fischer; R Ladurner; A Gangkofer; S Bensler; K K Hallfeldt; M Reiser; A Lienemann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Detection of abdominal wall adhesions using visceral slide.

Authors:  Nellie Bering Zinther; Anna Zeuten; Edvard Marinovskij; Margit Haislund; Hans Friis-Andersen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous upper or lower abdominal surgery.

Authors:  A J Karayiannakis; A Polychronidis; S Perente; S Botaitis; C Simopoulos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a child with upper transverse scarring: report of a case.

Authors:  K Nakajima; Y Fukui; S Kamata; N Usui; T Kobayashi; H Nakai; M Fukuzawa; A Okada
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.