Literature DB >> 26388927

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous upper abdominal operations.

Keong Won Yun1, Young Joon Ahn2, Hae Won Lee2, In Mok Jung2, Jung Kee Chung2, Seung Chul Heo2, Ki-Tae Hwang2, Hye Seong Ahn2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: We aimed to to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in patients with previous upper abdominal surgery.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed on data from the attempted laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in 44 patients. Among them, 5 patients with previous lower abdominal operation were excluded. 39 patients were divided into two groups according to presence of previous upper abdominal operation; Group A: patients without history of abdominal operation. (n=27), Group B: patients with history of upper abdominal operation. Both groups (n=12) were compared to each other, with respect to clinical characteristics, operation time, postoperative hospital stay, open conversion rate, postoperative complication, duct clearance and mortality.
RESULTS: All of the 39 patients received laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and choledochotomy with T-tube drainage (n=38 [97.4%]) or with primary closure (n=1). These two groups were not statistically different in gender, mean age and presence of co-morbidity, mean operation time (164.5±63.1 min in group A and 134.8±45.2 min in group B, p=0.18) and postoperative hospital stay (12.6±5.7 days in group A and 9.8±2.9 days in group B, p=0.158). Duct clearance and complication rates were comparable (p>0.05). 4 cases were converted to open in group A and 1 case in group B respectively. In group A (4 of 27 (14.8%) and 1 of 12 (8.3%) in group B, p=0.312) Trocar or Veress needle related complication did not occur in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: LCBDE appears to be a safe and effective treatment even in the patients with previous upper abdominal operation if performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeon, and it can be the best alternative to failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for difficult cholelithiasis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration; Previous surgery

Year:  2012        PMID: 26388927      PMCID: PMC4574995          DOI: 10.14701/kjhbps.2012.16.4.154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg        ISSN: 1738-6349


  27 in total

1.  Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration.

Authors:  D R Urbach; Y S Khajanchee; B A Jobe; B A Standage; P D Hansen; L L Swanstrom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Vascular injuries during laparoscopy associated with the Hasson technique.

Authors:  R M Hanney; H L Carmalt; N Merrett; N Tait
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Comparison of laparoscopic choledochotomy closure techniques.

Authors:  J S Wu; N J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Reoperation of biliary tract by laparoscopy: experiences with 39 cases.

Authors:  Li-Bo Li; Xiu-Jun Cai; Yi-Ping Mou; Qi Wei
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  M Rhodes; L Sussman; L Cohen; M P Lewis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-17       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Establishing pneumoperitoneum: Verres or Hasson? The debate continues.

Authors:  N Dunne; M I Booth; T C B Dehn
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Detection of abdominal wall adhesions using visceral slide.

Authors:  Nellie Bering Zinther; Anna Zeuten; Edvard Marinovskij; Margit Haislund; Hans Friis-Andersen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Sphincter of Oddi-preserving and T-tube-free laparoscopic management of extrahepatic bile duct calculi.

Authors:  Chun-Chih Chen; Shuo-Dong Wu; Yu Tian; Ernest Amos Siwo; Xin-Tao Zeng; Guang-Hui Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Trend towards primary closure following laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  M Jameel; B Darmas; A L Baker
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 10.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous upper or lower abdominal surgery.

Authors:  A J Karayiannakis; A Polychronidis; S Perente; S Botaitis; C Simopoulos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  4 in total

1.  Laparoscopic treatment of a recurrent biliary stone forming around a Hem-o-lok clip in a patient with previous gastrectomies: Case report.

Authors:  Chao Jiang; Xueyan Liu; Shuxuan Li; Guangzhen Wu; Guangyi Wang; Meng Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous upper abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Jisheng Zhu; Gen Sun; Le Hong; Xiaohua Li; Yong Li; Weidong Xiao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Yong Huang; Qian Feng; Kai Wang; Xiaoli Xiong; Shubing Zou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous abdominal biliary tract operations.

Authors:  Min Li; Ying Tao; Sheng Shen; Lujun Song; Tao Suo; Han Liu; Yueqi Wang; Dexiang Zhang; Xiaoling Ni; Houbao Liu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 4.584

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.