Literature DB >> 14560190

Wear analysis of the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis.

Paul A Anderson1, Jeffrey P Rouleau, Vincent E Bryan, Cathy S Carlson.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: In vitro wear testing of the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis was performed in a cervical spine simulator. The biologic response was assessed in chimpanzee and goat animal models.
OBJECTIVE: Determine the wear characteristics of the Bryan disc. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Large joint arthroplasties fail most commonly by wear and consequent formation of particulate material, which induces an inflammatory response. Therefore, measuring the wear characteristics of the new spinal disc replacements is important.
METHODS: Six prosthetic assembles were tested to 10 or 40 million cycles by load and motion and 3 additional assemblies were tested by load only in a cervical spine simulator. Any debris was examined using ASTM standards. The local biologic response to the prosthesis was examined in two chimpanzees. Nine goats were used to assess the biologic response in both local and distant tissues. Arthrodesis was performed on three additional control goats that received an allograft and an anterior cervical plate.
RESULTS: Wear results: cervical spine simulators that applied the loads and motions associated with activities of daily living produced wear particulate at a rate of 1.2 mg per million cycles. Device height decreased 0.02 mm per million cycles with approximately 77% of this decrease due to gradual creep of the nucleus under the constant compressive load. Particles generated were granular in shape with a mean feret diameter of 3.9 microm. All animals tolerated placement of the Bryan disc. Wear debris was present in the periprosthetic and epidural spaces in some animals. However, no significant inflammatory response was observed. No wear material was found distant from the implant in draining lymph tissue, the liver, or the spleen.
CONCLUSIONS: The Bryan disc has satisfactory wear characteristics and does not produce a significant inflammatory response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14560190     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092212.42388.79

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  18 in total

1.  Cervical disc prosthesis replacement and interbody fusion: a comparative study.

Authors:  Sun Peng-Fei; Jia Yu-Hua
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Multidirectional flexibility analysis of anterior and posterior lumbar artificial disc reconstruction: in vitro human cadaveric spine model.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Kotani; Bryan W Cunningham; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Anton E Dmitriev; Niabin Hu; Manabu Ito; Yasuo Shikinami; Paul C McAfee; Akio Minami
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Parameters that effect spine biomechanics following cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Vijay K Goel; Ahmad Faizan; Vivek Palepu; Sanghita Bhattacharya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The Latest Lessons Learned from Retrieval Analyses of Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, and Alternative Bearing Total Disc Replacements.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Jeffrey M Toth; Ryan Siskey; Lauren Ciccarelli; Dan Macdonald; Jorge Isaza; Todd Lanman; Ilona Punt; Marla Steinbeck; Jan Goffin; André van Ooij
Journal:  Semin Spine Surg       Date:  2012-03-01

5.  Biotribological evaluation of artificial disc arthroplasty devices: influence of loading and kinematic patterns during in vitro wear simulation.

Authors:  Thomas M Grupp; James J Yue; Rolando Garcia; Janet Basson; Jens Schwiesau; Bernhard Fritz; Wilhelm Blömer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A systematic review of cervical artificial disc replacement wear characteristics and durability.

Authors:  Ronald Lehman; Adam J Bevevino; Devon D Brewer; Andrea C Skelly; Paul A Anderson
Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J       Date:  2012-02

7.  PEEK (Polyether-ether-ketone) Based Cervical Total Disc Arthroplasty: Contact Stress and Lubrication Analysis.

Authors:  H Xin; Det Shepherd; Kd Dearn
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2012-05-09

8.  A review of the biologic effects of spine implant debris: Fact from fiction.

Authors:  Nadim James Hallab
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2009-12-01

9.  Bryan total disc arthroplasty: a replacement disc for cervical disc disease.

Authors:  Markus Wenger; Thomas-Marc Markwalder
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2010-07-30

10.  Do design variations in the artificial disc influence cervical spine biomechanics? A finite element investigation.

Authors:  Ahmad Faizan; Vijay K Goel; Steven R Garfin; Christopher M Bono; Hassan Serhan; Ashok Biyani; Hossein Elgafy; Manoj Krishna; Tai Friesem
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.