Literature DB >> 23389426

The capacity of audiovisual integration is limited to one item.

Erik Van der Burg1, Edward Awh, Christian N L Olivers.   

Abstract

The human visual attention system is geared toward detecting the most salient and relevant events in an overwhelming stream of information. There has been great interest in measuring how many visual events can be processed at a time, and most of the work has suggested that the limit is three to four. However, attention to a visual stimulus can also be driven by a synchronous auditory event. The present work indicates that a fundamentally different limit applies to audiovisual processing, such that at most only a single audiovisual event can be processed at a time. This limited capacity is not due to a limitation in visual selection; participants were able to process about four visual objects simultaneously. Instead, we propose that audiovisual orienting is subject to a fundamentally different capacity limit than pure visual selection is.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23389426      PMCID: PMC4476285          DOI: 10.1177/0956797612452865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  28 in total

1.  Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: a behavioral and electrophysiological study.

Authors:  M H Giard; F Peronnet
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  An event-related brain potential correlate of visual short-term memory.

Authors:  P Klaver; D Talsma; A A Wijers; H J Heinze; G Mulder
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-07-13       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Multisensory interaction in saccadic reaction time: a time-window-of-integration model.

Authors:  Hans Colonius; Adele Diederich
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Mechanisms of attentional priority.

Authors:  S Yantis; D N Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.

Authors:  S J Luck; E K Vogel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Familiarity and visual change detection.

Authors:  H Pashler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-10

7.  Shifts of visual attention to multiple simultaneous location cues.

Authors:  R D Wright
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1994-06

8.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.

Authors:  S J Luck; S A Hillyard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision.

Authors:  L M Trick; Z W Pylyshyn
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  14 in total

1.  Semantic congruency but not temporal synchrony enhances long-term memory performance for audio-visual scenes.

Authors:  Hauke S Meyerhoff; Markus Huff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04

2.  Spatial and frequency specificity of the ventriloquism aftereffect revisited.

Authors:  Patrick Bruns; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-12-28

3.  Audio-visual spatial alignment improves integration in the presence of a competing audio-visual stimulus.

Authors:  Justin T Fleming; Abigail L Noyce; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Attentional modulations of audiovisual interactions in apparent motion: Temporal ventriloquism effects on perceived visual speed.

Authors:  Aysun Duyar; Andrea Pavan; Hulusi Kafaligonul
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 2.157

5.  Exploring the effectiveness of auditory, visual, and audio-visual sensory cues in a multiple object tracking environment.

Authors:  Julia Föcker; Polly Atkins; Foivos-Christos Vantzos; Maximilian Wilhelm; Thomas Schenk; Hauke S Meyerhoff
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.157

6.  Interacting parallel pathways associate sounds with visual identity in auditory cortices.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Samantha Huang; Seppo P Ahlfors; Matti Hämäläinen; Stephanie Rossi; Mikko Sams; Iiro P Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Perception of visual apparent motion is modulated by a gap within concurrent auditory glides, even when it is illusory.

Authors:  Qingcui Wang; Lu Guo; Ming Bao; Lihan Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-19

8.  The impact of simulated MRI scanner background noise on visual attention processes as measured by the EEG.

Authors:  S Oliver Kobald; Stephan Getzmann; Christian Beste; Edmund Wascher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Window of audio-visual simultaneity is unaffected by spatio-temporal visual clutter.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; John Cass; David Alais
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Crossmodal Statistical Binding of Temporal Information and Stimuli Properties Recalibrates Perception of Visual Apparent Motion.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Lihan Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.