Literature DB >> 14521638

Randomized controlled trial of education and feedback for implementation of guidelines for acute low back pain.

Joel M Schectman1, W Scott Schroth, Dante Verme, John D Voss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The effect of clinical guidelines on resource utilization for complex conditions with substantial barriers to clinician behavior change has not been well studied. We report the impact of a multifaceted guideline implementation intervention on primary care clinician utilization of radiologic and specialty services for the care of acute low back pain.
DESIGN: Physician groups were randomized to receive guideline education and individual feedback, supporting patient education materials, both, or neither. The impact on guideline adherence and resource utilization was evaluated during the 12-month period before and after implementation. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen physician groups with 120 primary care physician and associate practitioners from 2 group model HMO practices.
INTERVENTIONS: Guideline implementation utilized an education/audit/feedback model with local peer opinion leaders. The patient education component included written and videotaped materials on the care of low back pain. MAIN
RESULTS: The clinician intervention was associated with an absolute increase in guideline-consistent behavior of 5.4% in the intervention group versus a decline of 2.7% in the control group (P =.04). The patient education intervention produced no significant change in guideline-consistent behavior, but was poorly adopted. Patient characteristics including duration of pain, prior history of low back pain, and number of visits during the illness episode were strong predictors of service utilization and guideline-consistent behavior.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an education and feedback-supported acute low back pain care guideline for primary care clinicians was associated with an increase in guideline-consistent behavior. Patient education materials did not enhance guideline effectiveness. Implementation barriers could limit the utility of this approach in usual care settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14521638      PMCID: PMC1494929          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.10205.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  67 in total

Review 1.  Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness.

Authors:  R N Shiffman; Y Liaw; C A Brandt; G J Corb
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Principles of educational outreach ('academic detailing') to improve clinical decision making.

Authors:  S B Soumerai; J Avorn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-01-26       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  No clinical effect of back schools in an HMO. A randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  D M Berwick; S Budman; M Feldstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Effect of medical record audit and feedback on residents' compliance with preventive health care guidelines.

Authors:  E Holmboe; R Scranton; K Sumption; R Hawkins
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 5.  Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians.

Authors:  J Lomas; G M Anderson; K Domnick-Pierre; E Vayda; M W Enkin; W J Hannah
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Back pain and sciatica.

Authors:  J W Frymoyer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-02-04       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The impact of clinical guidelines on practice patterns: doing more versus doing less.

Authors:  C E Carpenter; N E Johnson; J F Rosenfeld
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Reasons for repeated medical visits among patients with chronic back pain.

Authors:  C A McPhillips-Tangum; D C Cherkin; L A Rhodes; C Markham
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Understanding physicians' imaging test use in low back pain care: the role of focus groups.

Authors:  D Shye; D K Freeborn; J Romeo; S Eraker
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.038

10.  A comparison of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, and provision of an educational booklet for the treatment of patients with low back pain.

Authors:  D C Cherkin; R A Deyo; M Battié; J Street; W Barlow
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-10-08       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  Gerd Flodgren; Elena Parmelli; Gaby Doumit; Melina Gattellari; Mary Ann O'Brien; Jeremy Grimshaw; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-08-10

2.  IMPaCT Back study protocol. Implementation of subgrouping for targeted treatment systems for low back pain patients in primary care: a prospective population-based sequential comparison.

Authors:  Nadine E Foster; Ricky Mullis; Julie Young; Carol Doyle; Martyn Lewis; David Whitehurst; Elaine M Hay
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 3.  Activities to increase provider awareness of early syphilis in men who have sex with men in 8 cities, 2000-2004.

Authors:  Melaine Taylor; Larry Prescott; James Brown; William Wong; Michelle Allen; Dawn Broussard; Lori Jordahl; Peter Kerndt
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Is referral to a spine surgeon a double-edged sword?: patient concerns before consultation.

Authors:  Biniam Kidane; Rajiv Gandhi; Angela Sarro; Taufik A Valiante; Bart J Harvey; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce the use of imaging for low-back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hazel J Jenkins; Mark J Hancock; Simon D French; Chris G Maher; Roger M Engel; John S Magnussen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Barriers and progress in the treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  Nadine E Foster
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 8.775

7.  Improving the care for people with acute low-back pain by allied health professionals (the ALIGN trial): A cluster randomised trial protocol.

Authors:  Joanne E McKenzie; Denise A O'Connor; Matthew J Page; Duncan S Mortimer; Simon D French; Bruce F Walker; Jennifer L Keating; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Susan Michie; Jill J Francis; Sally E Green
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Strategies to reduce the use of low-value medical tests in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Toshihiko Takada; Pauline Heus; Sander van Doorn; Christiana A Naaktgeboren; Jan-Willem Weenink; Simone A van Dulmen; Lotty Hooft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 9.  Interventions for improving the appropriate use of imaging in people with musculoskeletal conditions.

Authors:  Simon D French; Sally Green; Rachelle Buchbinder; Hayley Barnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

Review 10.  Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  Louise Forsetlund; Arild Bjørndal; Arash Rashidian; Gro Jamtvedt; Mary Ann O'Brien; Fredric Wolf; Dave Davis; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.