Literature DB >> 9690881

Understanding physicians' imaging test use in low back pain care: the role of focus groups.

D Shye1, D K Freeborn, J Romeo, S Eraker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To gain understanding about why a controlled intervention to reduce variability in lumbar spine imaging test use rates for low back pain patients was ineffective among internal medicine and family practice physicians in a large US health maintenance organization.
DESIGN: We retrospectively analyzed data from focus groups that had been conducted prior to the implementation of the intervention. The physicians were asked about the factors that influence their decisions to order such tests. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine and family practice physicians in the intervention group. MAIN STUDY
FINDINGS: Most of the variability in physicians' imaging test ordering appeared to occur in the care of patients with back pain of non-traumatic origin who had no radicular symptoms. Within that clinical context, nonclinical factors such as patient age and work status, time constraints, access problems and ambiguity about internal referral processes were important factors in physicians' decisions. Especially relevant were tensions and conflicts the physicians face as they attempted to meet conflicting role obligations in the health maintenance organization. These tensions raised issues of patient trust in their physicians and in medical care organizations, and it appeared that imaging test orders sometimes served social and symbolic functions in resolving them.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that gaining information from focus groups prior to designing physician behavior change interventions may aid the design of more effective interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9690881     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/10.2.83

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  18 in total

1.  Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence.

Authors:  Patrick Loisel; Rachelle Buchbinder; Rowland Hazard; Robert Keller; Inger Scheel; Maurits van Tulder; Barbara Webster
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

2.  Using body mass index to identify overweight children: barriers and facilitators in primary care.

Authors:  Kori B Flower; Eliana M Perrin; Claire I Viadro; Alice S Ammerman
Journal:  Ambul Pediatr       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

3.  The assessment of function. Part II: clinical perspective of a javelin thrower with low back and groin pain.

Authors:  Michael P Reiman; Robert C Manske
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-05

4.  Low back pain in general practice: reported management and reasons for not adhering to the guidelines in The Netherlands.

Authors:  H Schers; J Braspenning; R Drijver; M Wensing; R Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Physicians' perceptions of patients' social and behavioral characteristics and race disparities in treatment recommendations for men with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Michelle van Ryn; Diana Burgess; Jennifer Malat; Joan Griffin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Chronic low back pain: non-clinical factors impacting on management by Irish doctors.

Authors:  B M Fullen; C Doody; G David Baxter; L E Daly; D A Hurley
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Low Back Imaging When Not Indicated: A Descriptive Cross-System Analysis.

Authors:  Rachel Gold; Elizabeth Esterberg; Celine Hollombe; Jill Arkind; Patricia A Vakarcs; Huong Tran; Tim Burdick; Jennifer E Devoe; Michael A Horberg
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2016-02-25

8.  Acute low back pain management in general practice: uncertainty and conflicting certainties.

Authors:  Ben Darlow; Sarah Dean; Meredith Perry; Fiona Mathieson; G David Baxter; Anthony Dowell
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  Randomized controlled trial of education and feedback for implementation of guidelines for acute low back pain.

Authors:  Joel M Schectman; W Scott Schroth; Dante Verme; John D Voss
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Identifying factors likely to influence compliance with diagnostic imaging guideline recommendations for spine disorders among chiropractors in North America: a focus group study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Authors:  André E Bussières; Andrea M Patey; Jill J Francis; Anne E Sales; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Melissa Brouwers; Gaston Godin; Jan Hux; Marie Johnston; Louise Lemyre; Marie-Pascale Pomey; Anne Sales; Merrick Zwarenstein
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.