Literature DB >> 2523581

No clinical effect of back schools in an HMO. A randomized prospective trial.

D M Berwick1, S Budman, M Feldstein.   

Abstract

In a prospective trial, 222 adults with low-back pain of at least 2 weeks' duration in a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) were randomly assigned to usual care (UC), a 4-hour back school psychoeducational session (LBS), or the same back school plus a 1-year "compliance package" program designed to encourage appropriate self-management for back pain (CP). Sixty-four percent of LBS and CP subjects attended their back school sessions. Follow-up measurement of pain level (using the Visual Analogue Scale), functional status (using the Sickness Impact Profile), and various other indicators of health status showed no measurable effect of either treatment condition (LBS or CP) compared with UC at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after entry into the study. Initial disability resolved by 3 months in most patients, and a minority of subjects (10-15%) showed residual or recurrent functional impairment 1 year after entry. Health care utilization tended to be slightly higher after intervention in the CP group. With or without follow-up encouragement, back school instructions given in a single 4-hour session had no measurable impact on the comfort or functional status of the majority of patients with new onset back pain in this HMO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2523581     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198903000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

Review 1.  Back Schools for chronic non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Patrícia Parreira; Martijn W Heymans; Maurits W van Tulder; Rosmin Esmail; Bart W Koes; Nolwenn Poquet; Chung-Wei Christine Lin; Christopher G Maher
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-03

Review 2.  Interventions to improve adherence to exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults.

Authors:  Joanne L Jordan; Melanie A Holden; Elizabeth Ej Mason; Nadine E Foster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

3.  Management of occupational back pain: the Sherbrooke model. Results of a pilot and feasibility study.

Authors:  P Loisel; P Durand; L Abenhaim; L Gosselin; R Simard; J Turcotte; J M Esdaile
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Back injury prevention programs: A critical review of the literature.

Authors:  P M King
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1993-09

5.  Randomized controlled trial of education and feedback for implementation of guidelines for acute low back pain.

Authors:  Joel M Schectman; W Scott Schroth; Dante Verme; John D Voss
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Amount of health care and self-care following a randomized clinical trial comparing flexion-distraction with exercise program for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Jerrilyn A Cambron; M Ram Gudavalli; Marion McGregor; James Jedlicka; Michael Keenum; Alexander J Ghanayem; Avinash G Patwardhan; Sylvia E Furner
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2006-08-24

7.  Multi-disciplinary interventions for chronic pain involving education: A systematic review.

Authors:  Shirdhya Joypaul; Fiona Kelly; Sara S McMillan; Michelle A King
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.