Literature DB >> 9613883

Reasons for repeated medical visits among patients with chronic back pain.

C A McPhillips-Tangum1, D C Cherkin, L A Rhodes, C Markham.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study identifies the key motivations of patients repeatedly seeking medical care for chronic back problems.
DESIGN: We conducted one-on-one, in-depth interviews with patients to discuss their experiences with low back pain and its care. To validate our interpretation of the qualitative data, participants were mailed questionnaires listing the themes identified in the interviews and asked to rate the importance to them of each of the themes.
SETTING: Managed health care plans in Atlanta, Dallas, and Seattle. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four patients (37% male, 63% female) who were 25 to 65 years of age and had three or more medically attended episodes of low back pain during the 3 years preceding the study. MAIN
RESULTS: In describing their motivations for seeking medical care for back pain, nearly all participants cited difficulty in performing normal activities and the desire to discover the cause of the pain. Other motivations for seeking medical care for back pain included increased pain and the desire for a diagnostic test or a new treatment. Many of the verbalized reasons for repeated medical visits among patients with chronic back pain are probably best understood as seeking validation of their suffering.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chronic back pain report many unmet needs and expectations. Overall satisfaction might be improved if clinicians elicit patients' views of underlying causes and their expectations from office visits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9613883      PMCID: PMC1496956          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00093.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  12 in total

1.  Use of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) to identify hospitalizations for mechanical low back problems in administrative databases.

Authors:  D C Cherkin; R A Deyo; E Volinn; J D Loeser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Cost, controversy, crisis: low back pain and the health of the public.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D Cherkin; D Conrad; E Volinn
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 21.981

3.  Descriptive epidemiology of low-back pain and its related medical care in the United States.

Authors:  R A Deyo; Y J Tsui-Wu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders.

Authors: 
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Back pain and sciatica.

Authors:  J W Frymoyer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-02-04       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Conservative therapy for low back pain. Distinguishing useful from useless therapy.

Authors:  R A Deyo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-08-26       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  General practice consultations: is there any point in being positive?

Authors:  K B Thomas
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-05-09

8.  Characteristics of physician visits for back symptoms: a national perspective.

Authors:  B K Cypress
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Factors associated with choosing a chiropractor for episodes of back pain care.

Authors:  P G Shekelle; M Markovich; R Louie
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Evaluation of a physician education intervention to improve primary care for low-back pain. II. Impact on patients.

Authors:  D Cherkin; R A Deyo; A O Berg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  19 in total

1.  Label is unhelpful.

Authors:  Jos H Verbeek
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-25

2.  Regional Supply of Chiropractic Care and Visits to Primary Care Physicians for Back and Neck Pain.

Authors:  Matthew A Davis; Olga Yakusheva; Daniel J Gottlieb; Julie P W Bynum
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.657

Review 3.  Why health expectations and hopes are different: the development of a conceptual model.

Authors:  Karen K Leung; James L Silvius; Nicholas Pimlott; William Dalziel; Neil Drummond
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  What circumstances prompt a workplace discussion in medical evaluations for back pain?

Authors:  William S Shaw; Edward H Chin; Candace C Nelson; Silje Endresen Reme; Mary J Woiszwillo; Santosh K Verma
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-03

5.  Examination of the Lumbar Movement Pattern during a Clinical Test and a Functional Activity Test in People with and without Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Andrej V Marich; Ching-Ting Hwang; Christopher J Sorensen; Linda R van Dillen
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  Consistency of a lumbar movement pattern across functional activities in people with low back pain.

Authors:  Andrej V Marich; Ching-Ting Hwang; Gretchen B Salsich; Catherine E Lang; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 7.  Overtreating chronic back pain: time to back off?

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Sohail K Mirza; Judith A Turner; Brook I Martin
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

8.  Randomized controlled trial of education and feedback for implementation of guidelines for acute low back pain.

Authors:  Joel M Schectman; W Scott Schroth; Dante Verme; John D Voss
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Ontario Musculoskeletal Physiotherapists' Attitudes toward and Beliefs about Managing Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Elizabeth Benny; Cathy Evans
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 1.037

10.  "Push" versus "Pull" for mobilizing pain evidence into practice across different health professions: a protocol for a randomized trial.

Authors:  Joy C MacDermid; Mary Law; Norman Buckley; Robert Brian Haynes
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.