Literature DB >> 2936052

Laparoscopy in patients admitted for acute abdominal pain.

O Reiertsen, A R Rosseland, B Høivik, K Solheim.   

Abstract

In 81 patients with acute abdominal pain, laparoscopy was performed because of diagnostic doubt. Diagnosis by clinical methods proved to be correct in 42 of the patients and laparoscopy gave correct diagnosis in 70. Appendectomy revealed acute appendicitis in 19 patients and normal appendix in five. Failure to establish a diagnosis by laparoscopy was due to incomplete visualization of appendix in nine patients, pelvic adhesions in one patient, and failure to enter the peritoneal cavity in another. A clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis could be invalidated by laparoscopy in 17 of 40 patients. Negative laparotomy is potentially avoidable by use of laparoscopy when a diagnosis of appendicitis is questionable. Laparoscopy may therefore be warrantable in such cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2936052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Chir Scand        ISSN: 0001-5482


  10 in total

1.  Is laparoscopic better than open appendectomy?

Authors:  K N Apelgren; R G Molnar; J M Kisala
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic surgery at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital.

Authors:  C S Grant; N Al-Kindy; N Machado; A S Daar
Journal:  J Sci Res Med Sci       Date:  2000-01

3.  [Laparoscopic appendectomy. A review of the literature].

Authors:  M Gawenda; S Said
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1994

4.  Three hundred consecutive emergent celiotomies in general surgery patients: influence of advanced diagnostic imaging techniques and procedures on diagnosis.

Authors:  Grace S Rozycki; Lorraine Tremblay; David V Feliciano; Richard Joseph; Pierre DeDelva; Jeffrey P Salomone; Jeffrey M Nicholas; Raymond A Cava; Joseph D Ansley; Walter L Ingram
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  A focus on intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Massimo Sartelli
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Prospective nonrandomized study of conventional versus laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  O Reiertsen; E Trondsen; A Bakka; O K Andersen; S Larsen; A R Rosseland
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Laparoscopy in the management of children with chronic recurrent abdominal pain.

Authors:  G Stringel; S H Berezin; H E Bostwick; M S Halata
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 8.  Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  S Sauerland; F Agresta; R Bergamaschi; G Borzellino; A Budzynski; G Champault; A Fingerhut; A Isla; M Johansson; P Lundorff; B Navez; S Saad; E A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 3.453

9.  Emergency laparoscopy--current best practice.

Authors:  Oliver Warren; James Kinross; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Ara Darzi
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children: Preliminary Study in Pediatric Hospital Albert Royer, Dakar.

Authors:  Mbaye Fall; Doudou Gueye; Ibrahima Bocar Wellé; Faty Balla Lo; Aloise Sagna; Marie Diop; Ibrahima Fall
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 2.260

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.