Literature DB >> 7676385

The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements--September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

E Neugebauer1, H Troidl, C K Kum, E Eypasch, M Miserez, A Paul.   

Abstract

Under the mandate of the Educational Committee of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (E.A.E.S.), three consensus development conferences (CDCs) were performed in order to assess the current status of the endoscopic surgical approaches for the treatment of cholelithiasis, appendicitis, and inguinal hernia. Consensus panels for the different disease states (10-13 members each) selected by the education committee on the basis of members' clinical expertise, academic activity, community influence, and geographical location weighed the evidence on the basis of published results according to the criteria for technology assessment: feasibility, efficacy, effectiveness, economy. Draft statements were prepared, discussed by the panels, and presented at plenary sessions of the 2nd European Congress of the E.A.E.S. in Madrid September 15-17, 1994. Following discussions final consensus statements were formulated to provide specific answers for each topic to a minimum of the following questions: 1. What stage of technological development is the endoscopic surgical procedure at (in September 1994)? 2. Is endoscopic surgery safe and feasible? 3. Is it beneficial to the patients? 4. Who should undergo endoscopic surgery? 5. What are the training recommendations? Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the procedure of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Laparoscopic appendectomy is presently at the efficacy stage of development, because most of the data on feasibility and safety originate from centers with special interest in endoscopic surgery: it is not yet the gold standard for acute appendicitis. Endoscopic hernia repair is presently a feasible alternative for conventional hernia repair if performed by experienced endoscopic surgeons. It appears to be efficacious in the short-term. The full text of the consensus panel's statements is given in this publication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7676385     DOI: 10.1007/bf00206852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  147 in total

1.  Technique of laparoscopic appendicectomy.

Authors:  P F Leahy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  A comparison of laparoscopic and traditional appendectomy.

Authors:  J L Sosa; D Sleeman; M G McKenney; J Dygert; D Yarish; L Martin
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1993-04

3.  Individualization of hernia repair: a new era.

Authors:  L M Nyhus
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 4.  Overview of therapeutic modalities for the treatment of gallstone diseases.

Authors:  S M Strasberg; P A Clavien
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for complicated gallstone disease.

Authors:  D R Fletcher; R M Jones; B O'Riordan; K J Hardy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy.

Authors:  V L Vallina; J M Velasco; C S McCulloch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  "Tension-free" inguinal herniorrhaphy: a preliminary report on the "mesh plug" technique.

Authors:  I M Rutkow; A W Robbins
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  E H Phillips; B J Carroll; J M Bello; M J Fallas; L Daykhovsky
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Laparoscopic extraperitoneal treatment of inguinal hernias in adults. A series of 200 cases.

Authors:  G F Begin
Journal:  Endosc Surg Allied Technol       Date:  1993-08

10.  Complications of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  B V MacFadyen; M E Arregui; J D Corbitt; C J Filipi; R J Fitzgibbons; M E Franklin; J B McKernan; D O Olsen; E H Phillips; D Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  38 in total

1.  Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J M Quintana; J Cabriada; I López de Tejada; M Varona; V Oribe; B Barrios; I Aróstegui; A Bilbao
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-12

2.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy--quality of life 7 years after surgery.

Authors:  Matthias Kapischke; Florian Friedrich; Jürgen Hedderich; Tim Schulz; Amke Caliebe
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions.

Authors:  Peter McCulloch; Irving Taylor; Mitsuru Sasako; Bryony Lovett; Damian Griffin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-15

Review 4.  Possibilities and limitations of current stereo-endoscopy.

Authors:  U D A Mueller-Richter; A Limberger; P Weber; K W Ruprecht; W Spitzer; M Schilling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The "inside approach of the gallbladder" is an alternative to the classic Calot's triangle dissection for a safe operation in severe cholecystitis.

Authors:  Catherine Hubert; Laurence Annet; Bernard E van Beers; Jean-François Gigot
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  Jimmy B Y So; Ee-Cherk Chiong; Edmond Chiong; Wei-Keat Cheah; David Lomanto; Peter Goh; Cheng-Kiong Kum
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Laparoscopic appendectomy significantly reduces length of stay for perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  S Towfigh; F Chen; R Mason; N Katkhouda; L Chan; T Berne
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Trends in the Use of Laparoscopic Versus Open Paediatric Appendicectomy: A Regional 12-Year Study and a National Survey.

Authors:  N R Bhatt; E Dunne; M Faraz; A E Gillis; K C Conlon; S Paran; P F Ridgway
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on hepatic function in obstructive jaundice: an experimental study in a rat model.

Authors:  Erdal Birol Bostanci; Sinan Yol; Zafer Teke; Cuneyt Kayaalp; Zisan Sakaogullari; Ummuhani Ozel Turkcu; Ayse Bilgihan; Musa Akoglu
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison.

Authors:  Hong-Bo Wei; Jiang-Long Huang; Zong-Heng Zheng; Bo Wei; Feng Zheng; Wan-Shou Qiu; Wei-Ping Guo; Tu-Feng Chen; Tian-Bao Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.