Literature DB >> 1437478

Salience of stimulus and response features in choice-reaction tasks.

T G Reeve1, R W Proctor, D J Weeks, L Dornier.   

Abstract

A pattern of differential reaction time (RT) benefits obtained in spatial-precuing tasks has been attributed to translation processes that operate on mental codes formed to represent the stimulus and response sets. According to the salient-features coding principle, the codes are based on the salient stimulus and response features, with RTs being fastest when the two sets of features correspond. Three experiments are reported in which the stimulus and response sets were manipulated using Gestalt grouping principles. In the first two experiments, stimuli and responses were grouped according to spatial proximity, whereas in the last experiment, they were grouped according to similarity. With both types of manipulations, the grouping of the stimulus set systematically affected the pattern of precuing benefits. Thus, in these experiments, the organization of the stimulus set was the primary determinant of the features selected for coding the stimulus and response sets in the translation process.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1437478     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  11 in total

1.  S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes.

Authors:  P M FITTS; R L DEININGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1954-12

2.  S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.

Authors:  P M FITTS; C M SEEGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-09

3.  The legacy of Gestalt psychology.

Authors:  I Rock; S Palmer
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.142

Review 4.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.

Authors:  S Kornblum; T Hasbroucq; A Osman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff during response preparation.

Authors:  J H Cauraugh
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code.

Authors:  R J Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-06

7.  Spatial relationships and S-R compatibility.

Authors:  J Brebner; M Shephard; P Cairney
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1972-02

8.  On the advance preparation of discrete finger responses.

Authors:  T G Reeve; R W Proctor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: in search of partial output.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Compatibility due to the coding of the relative position of the effectors.

Authors:  R Nicoletti; C Umiltà; E Ladavas
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1984-10
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

2.  Emergent perceptual features in the benefit of consistent stimulus-response mappings on dual-task performance.

Authors:  Kim-Phuong L Vu; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-10-08

3.  A deficit in older adults' effortful selection of cued responses.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; Kim-Phuong L Vu; David F Pick
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.328

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.