Literature DB >> 2132891

Speed-accuracy tradeoff during response preparation.

J H Cauraugh1.   

Abstract

The speed-accuracy operating curve was investigated in a movement precuing two- or four-choice reaction time task. Four levels of response preferences were manipulated with subject instructions and postresponse information: (a) accuracy, (b) reaction time latency, (c) accuracy and reaction time latency, and (d) no preference. Eighty subjects completed 480 discrete keypressing responses with the index and middle fingers of both hands. The mixed design mean reaction time analysis indicated faster performances for the reaction time latency and the accuracy and reaction time latency groups than the no preference group. Additionally, the percent correct analysis revealed two significant interactions: (a) Trial Block x Precue x Response Preference, and (b) Delay x Precue x Hand Position. Overall, the present findings provide partial support for the speed-accuracy operating curve predictions. Caution is advised when drawing chronometric inferences based only on reaction time data or when response accuracies are extremely high.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2132891     DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1990.10607496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport        ISSN: 0270-1367            Impact factor:   2.500


  5 in total

1.  Salience of stimulus and response features in choice-reaction tasks.

Authors:  T G Reeve; R W Proctor; D J Weeks; L Dornier
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-10

2.  A common cognitive profile in elderly fallers and in patients with Parkinson's disease: the prominence of impaired executive function and attention.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Hausdorff; Glen M Doniger; Shmuel Springer; Galit Yogev; Ely S Simon; Nir Giladi
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.645

3.  Validity of the Mindstreams computerized cognitive battery for mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Tzvi Dwolatzky; Victor Whitehead; Glen M Doniger; Ely S Simon; Avraham Schweiger; Dena Jaffe; Howard Chertkow
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.444

4.  Observing the observer (II): deciding when to decide.

Authors:  Jean Daunizeau; Hanneke E M den Ouden; Matthias Pessiglione; Stefan J Kiebel; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Validity of a novel computerized cognitive battery for mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Tzvi Dwolatzky; Victor Whitehead; Glen M Doniger; Ely S Simon; Avraham Schweiger; Dena Jaffe; Howard Chertkow
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2003-11-02       Impact factor: 3.921

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.