Literature DB >> 16801319

A deficit in older adults' effortful selection of cued responses.

Robert W Proctor1, Kim-Phuong L Vu, David F Pick.   

Abstract

J. J. Adam et al. (1998) provided evidence for an "age-related deficit in preparing 2 fingers on 2 hands, but not on 1 hand" (p. 870). Instead of having an anatomical basis, the deficit could result from the effortful processing required for individuals to select cued subsets of responses that do not coincide with left and right subgroups. The deficit also could involve either the ultimate benefit that can be attained or the time required to attain that benefit. The authors report 3 experiments (Ns = 40, 48, and 32 participants, respectively) in which they tested those distinctions by using an overlapped hand placement (participants alternated the index and middle fingers of the hands), a normal hand placement, and longer precuing intervals than were used in previous studies. The older adults were able to achieve the full precuing benefit shown by younger adults but required longer to achieve the maximal benefit for most pairs of responses. The deficit did not depend on whether the responses were from different hands, suggesting that it lies primarily in the effortful processing required for those subsets of cued responses that are not selected easily.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16801319      PMCID: PMC2111061          DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.38.4.265-284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  15 in total

1.  Salience of stimulus and response features in choice-reaction tasks.

Authors:  T G Reeve; R W Proctor; D J Weeks; L Dornier
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-10

2.  Preparing for perception and action (I): the role of grouping in the response-cuing paradigm.

Authors:  Jos J Adam; Bernhard Hommel; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Preprogramming, programming and reprogramming of aimed hand movements as a function of age.

Authors:  D D Larish; G E Stelmach
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Dissociating visual attention and effector selection in spatial precuing tasks.

Authors:  Jos J Adam; Jay Pratt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Age differences in the maintenance and restructuring of movement preparation.

Authors:  P C Amrhein; G E Stelmach; N L Goggin
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1991-09

6.  Effects of age on performance in a finger-precuing task.

Authors:  J J Adam; F G Paas; J C Teeken; E M van Loon; M P van Boxtel; P J Houx; J Jolles
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  On the advance preparation of discrete finger responses.

Authors:  T G Reeve; R W Proctor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1980-12

9.  Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions.

Authors:  D Goodman; J A Kelso
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1980-12

10.  Age-related changes in the efficiency of cognitive processing across the life span.

Authors:  Mark M Span; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Maurits W van der Molen
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2004-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  Age differences in response selection for pure and mixed stimulus-response mappings and tasks.

Authors:  Kim-Phuong L Vu; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-06-09

2.  Age-related differences in corticospinal excitability during a choice reaction time task.

Authors:  Koen Cuypers; Herbert Thijs; Julie Duque; Stephan P Swinnen; Oron Levin; Raf L J Meesen
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2012-09-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.