Literature DB >> 6235318

On the advance preparation of discrete finger responses.

T G Reeve, R W Proctor.   

Abstract

Most studies that examined the precuing of motor responses have been interpreted as indicating that response specification is a variable-order process. An apparent exception to this conclusion was obtained by Miller (1982) for the preparation of discrete finger responses. Precuing was beneficial only when the precued responses were on the same hand, suggesting that response specification occurs in a fixed order, with hand specified before other aspects of the response. Three experiments examined this discrepant finding for discrete finger responses. Experiment 1 demonstrated that with sufficient time (3 s), all combinations of responses can be equally well prepared. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that the precuing advantage for same-hand responses at shorter precuing intervals is due to strategic and decision factors, not to an ability to prepare these responses more efficiently. Preparation of finger responses, thus, also appears to be variable. This conclusion poses problems for Miller's extension of the precuing procedure to the evaluation of discrete versus continuous models of information processing.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6235318     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.4.541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  20 in total

Review 1.  Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

2.  Salience of stimulus and response features in choice-reaction tasks.

Authors:  T G Reeve; R W Proctor; D J Weeks; L Dornier
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-10

3.  Cuing efficiency in a Stroop-like task with visual half-field presentation.

Authors:  M Eglin; A Hunter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-09

4.  A deficit in older adults' effortful selection of cued responses.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; Kim-Phuong L Vu; David F Pick
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde; Peter Wühr
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

6.  Effects of precuing horizontal and vertical dimensions on right-left prevalence.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; Iring Koch; Kim-Phuong L Vu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

7.  The programming of structural properties of movement sequences.

Authors:  M Ziessler; K Hänel; D Sachse
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1990

8.  Evaluation of mental representation for same and mixed compatibility assignments.

Authors:  L A Dornier; T Gilmour Reeve
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-01

9.  Response mode modulates the congruency sequence effect in spatial conflict tasks: evidence from aimed-movement responses.

Authors:  Chae Eun Lim; Yang Seok Cho
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-06-26

10.  Response-compatibility effects in focused-attention tasks: a same-hand advantage in response activation.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.