Literature DB >> 16215745

Emergent perceptual features in the benefit of consistent stimulus-response mappings on dual-task performance.

Kim-Phuong L Vu1, Robert W Proctor.   

Abstract

Duncan (1979) examined all combinations of compatible and incompatible stimulus-response mappings for two spatial three-choice tasks in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Performance was better when the mappings for the tasks were consistent than when they were not, even when both mappings were incompatible. He attributed the benefit for the consistent incompatible mapping to an emergent choice between mappings when they are inconsistent that slows performance. Consistent incompatible mappings also may benefit from emergent perceptual features. The present study examined the role of emergent perceptual and mapping-choice features in two experiments that used pairs of two-choice tasks. Results similar to Duncan's were obtained with visual stimuli mapped to keypresses at short (stimulus onset asynchrony) SOAs. However, the benefit of the consistent incompatible mapping condition over the inconsistent mapping conditions was eliminated at an SOA of 1,000 ms. Furthermore, this benefit was not evident when the stimuli were auditory for Task 1 and visual for Task 2. With two-choice tasks, the benefit for consistent mappings apparently is due primarily to an emergent perceptual feature.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16215745     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0021-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  7 in total

1.  Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance.

Authors:  M C Lien; R W Proctor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance.

Authors:  Michael Tombu; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

4.  Salience of stimulus and response features in choice-reaction tasks.

Authors:  T G Reeve; R W Proctor; D J Weeks; L Dornier
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-10

5.  The psychological refractory period effect following callosotomy: uncoupling of lateralized response codes.

Authors:  R B Ivry; E A Franz; A Kingstone; J C Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Divided attention: the whole is more than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms.

Authors:  D E Meyer; D E Kieras
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.934

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Crossmodal action selection: evidence from dual-task compatibility.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Iring Koch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

2.  On the importance of Task 1 and error performance measures in PRP dual-task studies.

Authors:  Tilo Strobach; Anja Schütz; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.