Literature DB >> 1416684

A simple scoring system to reduce the negative appendicectomy rate.

F Christian1, G P Christian.   

Abstract

In a controlled, prospective study the following five criteria were used for the diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis: abdominal pain; vomiting; right lower quadrant tenderness; low grade fever (< or = 38.8 degrees C); and polymorphonuclear leucocytosis (TC > or = 10,000 with polymorphs > or = 75%). The aim of the study was to reduce the negative appendicectomy rate. If four out of five or five out of five criteria were present on admission, appendicectomy was carried out. On the other hand, if three out of five criteria were present on admission, the patient was subjected to active inpatient observation until either the development of the fourth criterion, when appendicectomy was performed, or until the patient recovered and the condition did not progress beyond the third criterion. Generalised peritonitis due to a perforated appendix was excluded from the study. Over a 1-year period, 58 patients (M:F = 45:13) were entered into the study. Appendicectomy was carried out in 46 (80%) of patients; of these, 32 patients (70%) were operated on soon after admission. The remaining 14 (30%) were operated on after a period of inpatient observation decided the development of the fourth criterion. A total of 12 patients (12/58 = 20%) did not undergo operation. The control group consisted of 59 patients upon whom appendicectomy was carried out by another surgical unit over the same 1-year period. The negative appendicectomy rate in the trial group was 6.5% (3/46), whereas in the control group it was 17% (10/59) (P < 0.05). We conclude that the use of a simple scoring system can significantly reduce the negative appendicectomy rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1416684      PMCID: PMC2497615     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  20 in total

1.  Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain: a multicentre study.

Authors:  I D Adams; M Chan; P C Clifford; W M Cooke; V Dallos; F T de Dombal; M H Edwards; D M Hancock; D J Hewett; N McIntyre
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-09-27

2.  Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain at Middlesbrough General Hospital.

Authors:  P Y Scarlett; W M Cooke; D Clarke; C Bates; M Chan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  A prospective study of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis.

Authors:  J B Puylaert; P H Rutgers; R I Lalisang; B C de Vries; S D van der Werf; J P Dörr; R A Blok
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-09-10       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Routine use of a scoring system for decision-making in suspected acute appendicitis in adults.

Authors:  G Fenyö
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1987-09

5.  Appendicitis. A critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1,000 cases.

Authors:  F R Lewis; J W Holcroft; J Boey; E Dunphy
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1975-05

6.  Appendicitis and mimicking conditions. A prospective study.

Authors:  O J Gilmore; J P Browett; P H Griffin; I K Ross; A J Brodribb; T J Cooke; M J Higgs; R C Williamson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-09-06       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Computer-aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain.

Authors:  F T de Dombal; D J Leaper; J R Staniland; A P McCann; J C Horrocks
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1972-04-01

8.  Acute abdominal pain in childhood, with special reference to cases not due to acute appendicitis.

Authors:  P F Jones
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1969-02-01

9.  Human and computer-aided diagnosis of abdominal pain: further report with emphasis on performance of clinicians.

Authors:  F T De Dombal; D J Leaper; J C Horrocks; J R Staniland; A P McCann
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1974-03-02

10.  Laparoscopy--a diagnostic aid in cases of suspected appendicitis. Its use in women of reproductive age.

Authors:  N M Spirtos; S M Eisenkop; T W Spirtos; R I Poliakin; L T Hibbard
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  17 in total

1.  A new approach to accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Nikolaos E Tzanakis; Stamatis P Efstathiou; Kecaris Danulidis; Georgios E Rallis; Dimitrios I Tsioulos; Anthimos Chatzivasiliou; Georgios Peros; Nikolaos I Nikiteas
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Assessment of peritonism in appendicitis.

Authors:  J Golledge; A P Toms; I J Franklin; M W Scriven; R B Galland
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  A diagnostic score for children with suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  Hannu Lintula; Erkki Pesonen; Hannu Kokki; Kari Vanamo; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-02-19       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  The evaluation of the validity of Alvarado, Eskelinen, Lintula and Ohmann scoring systems in diagnosing acute appendicitis in children.

Authors:  Arzu Sencan; Nail Aksoy; Melih Yıldız; Özkan Okur; Yusuf Demircan; Irfan Karaca
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Diagnostic score in acute appendicitis. Validation of a diagnostic score (Lintula score) for adults with suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  Hannu Lintula; Hannu Kokki; Jukka Pulkkinen; Riikka Kettunen; Oskari Gröhn; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 6.  Clinical Prediction Rules for Appendicitis in Adults: Which Is Best?

Authors:  Malsha Kularatna; Melanie Lauti; Cheyaanthan Haran; Wiremu MacFater; Laila Sheikh; Ying Huang; John McCall; Andrew D MacCormick
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Appendicitis score for children with suspected appendicitis. A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Hannu Lintula; Hannu Kokki; Riikka Kettunen; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Patients with clinical acute appendicitis should have pre-operative full blood count and C-reactive protein assays.

Authors:  D Birchley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Diagnostic score in appendicitis. Validation of a diagnostic score (Eskelinen score) in patients in whom acute appendicitis is suspected.

Authors:  H Sitter; S Hoffmann; I Hassan; A Zielke
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-11-18       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Acute appendicitis: is removal of a normal appendix still existing and can we reduce its rate?

Authors:  Gamal Khairy
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.