Literature DB >> 3094664

Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain: a multicentre study.

I D Adams, M Chan, P C Clifford, W M Cooke, V Dallos, F T de Dombal, M H Edwards, D M Hancock, D J Hewett, N McIntyre.   

Abstract

A multicentre study of computer aided diagnosis for patients with acute abdominal pain was performed in eight centres with over 250 participating doctors and 16,737 patients. Performance in diagnosis and decision making was compared over two periods: a test period (when a small computer system was provided to aid diagnosis) and a baseline period (before the system was installed). The two periods were well matched for type of case and rate of accrual. The system proved reliable and was used in 75.1% of possible cases. User reaction was broadly favourable. During the test period improvements were noted in diagnosis, decision making, and patient outcome. Initial diagnostic accuracy rose from 45.6% to 65.3%. The negative laparotomy rate fell by almost half, as did the perforation rate among patients with appendicitis (from 23.7% to 11.5%). The bad management error rate fell from 0.9% to 0.2%, and the observed mortality fell by 22.0%. The savings made were estimated as amounting to 278 laparotomies and 8,516 bed nights during the trial period--equivalent throughout the National Health Service to annual savings in resources worth over 20m pounds and direct cost savings of over 5m pounds. Computer aided diagnosis is a useful system for improving diagnosis and encouraging better clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3094664      PMCID: PMC1341582          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.293.6550.800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  7 in total

1.  Simplified computer-aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain.

Authors:  P D Wilson; J C Horrocks; P J Lyndon; C K Yeung; R E Page; F T De Dombal
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-04-12

2.  Diagnosis of acute abdominal pain in the accident and emergency department.

Authors:  D H Wilson; P D Wilson; R G Walmsley; J C Horrocks; F T De Dombal
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  The diagnosis of acute abdominal pain with computer analysis.

Authors:  A A Gunn
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1976-05

4.  Overview of randomised trials of diuretics in pregnancy.

Authors:  R Collins; S Yusuf; R Peto
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-01-05

5.  Randomization by group: a formal analysis.

Authors:  J Cornfield
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  A predictive instrument to improve coronary-care-unit admission practices in acute ischemic heart disease. A prospective multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  M W Pozen; R B D'Agostino; H P Selker; P A Sytkowski; W B Hood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-05-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Computer-aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain.

Authors:  F T de Dombal; D J Leaper; J R Staniland; A P McCann; J C Horrocks
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1972-04-01
  7 in total
  58 in total

1.  Use of a computerised maternity information system to improve clinical effectiveness: thromboprophylaxis at caesarean section.

Authors:  G M Taylor; C A McKenzie; G J Mires
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Can we improve diagnosis of acute appendicitis?

Authors:  S W Beasly
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-14

3.  Paediatric clinical decision support systems.

Authors:  P Ramnarayan; J Britto
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Measuring the impact of diagnostic decision support on the quality of clinical decision making: development of a reliable and valid composite score.

Authors:  Padmanabhan Ramnarayan; Ritika R Kapoor; Michael Coren; Vasantha Nanduri; Amanda L Tomlinson; Paul M Taylor; Jeremy C Wyatt; Joseph F Britto
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Audit of computer-aided diagnosis of abdominal pain in accident and emergency departments.

Authors:  P A Stonebridge; P Freeland; J B Rainey; D A Macleod
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1992-09

6.  Computers, diagnoses and patients with acute abdominal pain.

Authors:  F T de Dombal
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1992-09

7.  Differential diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in outpatients with non-specific cardiopulmonary symptoms.

Authors:  Alessandro Squizzato; Davide Luciani; Andrea Rubboli; Leonardo Di Gennaro; Leonardo Di Gennaro; Raffaele Landolfi; Carlo De Luca; Fernando Porro; Marco Moia; Sophie Testa; Davide Imberti; Guido Bertolini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 8.  Modeling paradigms for medical diagnostic decision support: a survey and future directions.

Authors:  Kavishwar B Wagholikar; Vijayraghavan Sundararajan; Ashok W Deshpande
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Evaluation of fuzzy relation method for medical decision support.

Authors:  Kavishwar Wagholikar; Sanjeev Mangrulkar; Ashok Deshpande; Vijayraghavan Sundararajan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  Review of the composition and use of trauma teams within the Trent Region.

Authors:  D A Highley
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1994-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.