Literature DB >> 8659965

Assessment of peritonism in appendicitis.

J Golledge1, A P Toms, I J Franklin, M W Scriven, R B Galland.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of different methods of demonstrating right iliac fossa peritonism in appendicitis. The methods used were cat's eye symptom (pain on going over a bump in the road), cough sign, right iliac fossa tenderness, percussion tenderness, rebound tenderness and guarding. A series of 100 consecutive patients with a median age of 25 years (range 4-81 years), presenting with right iliac fossa pain were studied prospectively; the male:female ratio was 39:61. In all, 58 patients underwent operation, 44 had appendicitis confirmed on histology. Fourteen patients had a normal appendix removed; 11 were women aged between 16 and 45 years. Cat's eye symptom and cough sign were sensitive indicators of appendicitis (sensitivity 0.80 and 0.82, respectively), but were not specific (specificity 0.52 and 0.50, respectively) and therefore inaccurate (accuracy 64%). Percussion tenderness was less sensitive (sensitivity 0.57) but more specific (specificity 0.86). Rebound tenderness proved to be sensitive (sensitivity 0.82), specific (specificity 0.89) and accurate (accuracy 86%). Thus, rebound tenderness had a positive predictive value of 86% compared with 56% and 57% for cough sign and cat's eye symptom, respectively. In the difficult diagnostic group of young women, the positive predictive value of rebound tenderness was 88% compared with 58% and 56% for cat's eye symptom and cough sign. Appendicitis remains a difficult diagnosis, particularly in young women. Rebound tenderness still has an important role to play in clinical assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8659965      PMCID: PMC2502643     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  21 in total

1.  The physiological basis for diagnostic signs of an acute abdomen.

Authors:  S W MOORE
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  The significance of rebound tenderness in the acute abdomen.

Authors:  W G Prout
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Appendicitis. A critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1,000 cases.

Authors:  F R Lewis; J W Holcroft; J Boey; E Dunphy
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1975-05

4.  Fine-catheter peritoneal cytology in the management of acute abdominal pain.

Authors:  J M Blazeby; B R Tulloh; D C Adams; K R Poskitt; J B Bristol
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Acute appendicitis: a clinical study of 1018 cases of emergency appendectomy.

Authors:  R Pieper; L Kager; P Näsman
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1982

6.  Acute appendicitis. Prospective trial concerning diagnostic accuracy and complications.

Authors:  P Jess; B Bjerregaard; S Brynitz; J Holst-Christensen; E Kalaja; J Lund-Kristensen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Impact of adjunctive testing on the diagnosis and clinical course of patients with acute appendicitis.

Authors:  M R Sarfati; G C Hunter; D B Witzke; G G Bebb; S H Smythe; S Boyan; W D Rappaport
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Scoring system to aid in diagnoses of appendicitis.

Authors:  I Teicher; B Landa; M Cohen; L S Kabnick; L Wise
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Practical score to aid decision making in doubtful cases of appendicitis.

Authors:  J M Ramirez; J Deus
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Sex-specific diagnostic scores for acute appendicitis.

Authors:  M Eskelinen; J Ikonen; P Lipponen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  9 in total

1.  A useful sign for the diagnosis of peritoneal irritation in the right iliac fossa and Can serum interleukin-6 levels predict the outcome of patients with right iliac fossa pain?

Authors:  M Davenport
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  A useful sign for the diagnosis of peritoneal irritation in the right iliac fossa.

Authors:  R Lane; J Grabham
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Abdominal Physical Signs and Medical Eponyms: Part II. Physical Examination of Palpation, 1907-1926.

Authors:  Vaibhav Rastogi; Devina Singh; Halil Tekiner; Fan Ye; Joseph J Mazza; Steven H Yale
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2019-06

4.  Abdominal Physical Signs of Inspection and Medical Eponyms.

Authors:  Vaibhav Rastogi; Devina Singh; Halil Tekiner; Fan Ye; Joseph J Mazza; Steven H Yale
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2019-07-15

Review 5.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Abdominal Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vanja Giljaca; Tin Nadarevic; Goran Poropat; Vesna Stefanac Nadarevic; Davor Stimac
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  An approach to model Right Iliac Fossa pain using pain-only-parameters for screening acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Subhagata Chattopadhyay; Fethi Rabhi; U Rajendra Acharya; Rohan Joshi; Rudhram Gajendran
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Does CT Reduce the Rate of Negative Laparoscopies for Acute Appendicitis? A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Pedro de J Wagner; Muthana Haroon; Stefan Morarasu; Emmanuel Eguare; Osama Al-Sahaf
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar

Review 8.  Can The 'Speed Bump Sign' Be a Diagnostic Tool for Acute Appendicitis? Evidence-Based Appraisal by Meta-Analysis and GRADE.

Authors:  Ling Wang; Ching-Hsien Ling; Pei-Chun Lai; Yen-Ta Huang
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-18

9.  Pain over speed bumps in diagnosis of acute appendicitis: diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Helen F Ashdown; Nigel D'Souza; Diallah Karim; Richard J Stevens; Andrew Huang; Anthony Harnden
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-12-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.