Literature DB >> 3321809

Routine use of a scoring system for decision-making in suspected acute appendicitis in adults.

G Fenyö1.   

Abstract

Clinical data from 259 patients with suspected acute appendicitis were prospectively collected and used in construction of a Bayesian scoring system, comprising 19 attributes, for preoperative diagnosis. The scoring system was integrated into the routine clinical management of a prospective series of 830 patients. Laparotomy was performed in 310 cases, and of these 256 had acute appendicitis (perforation in 14%). Excluding 6 cases with normal appendix but laparotomy mandatory for other reasons, the negative laparotomy rate was 15.5%. This rate was significantly lower than in earlier series from the same hospital and in more than 8,000 appendectomies performed in Sweden since 1969. The scoring system had 90.2% sensitivity, 91.4% specificity, 82.5% positive predictive value and 95.4% negative predictive value. The system is regarded only as an aid in diagnosis, to be used in combination with clinicians' judgements. Construction of a local data base probably is essential for results equivalent to those here reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3321809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Chir Scand        ISSN: 0001-5482


  14 in total

1.  A new approach to accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Nikolaos E Tzanakis; Stamatis P Efstathiou; Kecaris Danulidis; Georgios E Rallis; Dimitrios I Tsioulos; Anthimos Chatzivasiliou; Georgios Peros; Nikolaos I Nikiteas
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Non-specific abdominal pain: the resource implications.

Authors:  W G Sheridan; A T White; T Havard; D L Crosby
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  Field trials of medical decision-aids: potential problems and solutions.

Authors:  J Wyatt; D Spiegelhalter
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1991

4.  A diagnostic score for children with suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  Hannu Lintula; Erkki Pesonen; Hannu Kokki; Kari Vanamo; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-02-19       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Can the efficiency of modified Alvarado scoring system in the diagnosis acute appendicitis be increased with tenesmus?

Authors:  Hakan Bulus; Adnan Tas; Baris Morkavuk; Seyfettin Koklu; Derya Soy; Ali Coskun
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 6.  Clinical Prediction Rules for Appendicitis in Adults: Which Is Best?

Authors:  Malsha Kularatna; Melanie Lauti; Cheyaanthan Haran; Wiremu MacFater; Laila Sheikh; Ying Huang; John McCall; Andrew D MacCormick
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  How does computer-aided diagnosis improve the management of acute abdominal pain?

Authors:  J Wellwood; S Johannessen; D J Spiegelhalter
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  A simple scoring system to reduce the negative appendicectomy rate.

Authors:  F Christian; G P Christian
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 9.  The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Robert Ohle; Fran O'Reilly; Kirsty K O'Brien; Tom Fahey; Borislav D Dimitrov
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Surgical decision-making in acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Eva Sandell; Maria Berg; Gabriel Sandblom; Joar Sundman; Ulf Fränneby; Lennart Boström; Åke Andrén-Sandberg
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.