Literature DB >> 16811883

Molecular contingencies: reinforcement probability.

J M Hale, C P Shimp.   

Abstract

Pigeons obtained food by responding in a discrete-trials two-choice probability-learning experiment involving temporal stimuli. A given response alternative, a left- or right-key peck, had 11 associated reinforcement probabilities within each session. Reinforcement probability for a choice was an increasing or a decreasing function of the time interval immediately preceding the choice. The 11 equiprobable temporal stimuli ranged from 1 to 11 sec in 1-sec classes. Preference tended to deviate from probability matching in the direction of maximizing; i.e., the percentage of choices of the preferred response alternative tended to exceed the probability of reinforcement for that alternative. This result was qualitatively consistent with probability-learning experiments using visual stimuli. The result is consistent with a molecular analysis of operant behavior and poses a difficulty for molar theories holding that local variations in reinforcement probability may safely be disregarded in the analysis of behavior maintained by operant paradigms.

Year:  1975        PMID: 16811883      PMCID: PMC1333433          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  FURTHER EXPERIMENTS ON PROBABILITY-MATCHING IN THE PIGEON.

Authors:  V GRAF; D H BULLOCK; M E BITTERMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Time-allocation, matching, and contrast.

Authors:  C P Shimp; L Hawkes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Time allocation and response rate.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Reinforcement of behavioral patterns: shaping a scallop.

Authors:  L Hawkes; C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Self-inhibiting effects of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Local patterns of responding maintained by concurrent and multiple schedules.

Authors:  R L Menlove
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The correlation-based law of effect.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The reinforcement of short interresponse times.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Probabilistically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Short-term memory in the pigeon: the previously reinforced response.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Cognition, behavior, and the experimental analysis of behavior.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Some implications of a relational principle of reinforcement.

Authors:  J W Donahoe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Relations between Description and Experimentation in the Metacontingency Enterprise: An Interbehavioral Analysis.

Authors:  Will Fleming; Linda J Hayes
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-05-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.