Literature DB >> 1202121

Stimulus change as a factor in response maintenance with free food available.

S R Osborne, M Shelby.   

Abstract

Rats bar pressed for food on a reinforcement schedule in which every response was reinforced, even though a dish of pellets was present. Initially, auditory and visual stimuli accompanied response-produced food presentation. With stimulus feedback as an added consequence of bar pressing, responding was maintained in the presence of free food; without stimulus feedback, responding decreased to a low level. Auditory feedback maintained slightly more responding than did visual feedback, and both together maintained more responding than did either separately. Almost no responding occurred when the only consequence of bar pressing was stimulus feedback. The data indicated conditioned and sensory reinforcement effects of response-produced stimulus feedback.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1202121      PMCID: PMC1333376          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  Stimulus complexity and sensory reinforcement.

Authors:  G W BARNES; A BARON
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1961-08

2.  A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  R T KELLEHER; L R GOLLUB
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effects of stimulus novelty on gnawing and eating by rats.

Authors:  W I WELKER; W A KING
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1962-10

4.  Second-order schedules and the problem of conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Stimulus change contemporaneous with food presentation maintains responding in the presence of free food.

Authors:  R F Wallace; S Osborne; J Norborg; E Fantino
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-12-07       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Some sources of variation in the bar-pressing versus freeloading phenomenon in rats.

Authors:  R D Tarte; R L Snyder
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1973-07

7.  Food-avoidance in hungry pigeons, and other perplexities.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; D H Loveland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Many responses per food reward with free food present.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-07-31       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Animals respond for food in the presence of free food.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-10-17       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Rats' preference for earned in comparison with free food.

Authors:  B Carder; K Berkowitz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-02-27       Impact factor: 47.728

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Automaintenance without stimulus-change reinforcement: Temporal control of key pecks.

Authors:  J Myerson; W A Myerson; B K Parker
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Response-independent outcomes impact response rates and judgments of control differentially depending on rate of response-dependent outcomes.

Authors:  Phil Reed
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.986

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.