Literature DB >> 10866353

Progressive-ratio schedules: effects of later schedule requirements on earlier performances.

A Baron1, A Derenne.   

Abstract

Four rats were studied with variants of a progressive-ratio schedule with a step size of 6 in which different terminal components followed completion of the 20th ratio: (a) a reversal of the progression, (b) a fixed-ratio 6 schedule, or (c) extinction. Responding in the progressive-ratio components of these schedules was compared to performances under conventional progressive-ratio baselines. Under baseline conditions, postreinforcement pauses increased exponentially as a function of increasing ratio size, whereas running rates showed modest declines. The procedure of linking the progressive-ratio schedule to the reversed progression or to the fixed-ratio component resulted in decreased pausing. Linking the progressive-ratio schedule to the extinction component had the opposite effect, that of producing weakened progressive-ratio performances as evidenced by increased pausing. Subjects whose responses were reinforced on half of the ratios also showed exponential increases; however, pauses were substantially shorter following ratios on which the reinforcer was omitted. The results suggested that progressive-ratio pausing reflects the influence of remote as well as local contingencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10866353      PMCID: PMC1284778          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2000.73-291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  18 in total

1.  Progressive ratio and fixed ratio schedules of cocaine-maintained responding in baboons.

Authors:  R R Griffiths; L D Bradford; J V Brady
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Effects of increment size and reinforcer volume on progressive ratio performance.

Authors:  W HODOS; G KALMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  An experimental outline for building and exploring multi-operant behavior repertoires.

Authors:  J D FINDLEY
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Averaging Effects In The Study Of Fixed-ratio Response Patterns.

Authors:  A Baron; L Herpolsheimer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Temporal tracking on cyclic-interval reinforcement schedules.

Authors:  N K Innis; J E Staddon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Depriving rats of food: A reappraisal of two techniques.

Authors:  H M Hurwitz; H Davis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of step size and break-point criterion on progressive-ratio performance.

Authors:  D Stafford; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 8.  Progressive ratio schedules in drug self-administration studies in rats: a method to evaluate reinforcing efficacy.

Authors:  N R Richardson; D C Roberts
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  The effect of small sequential changes in fixed-ratio size upon the post-reinforcement pause.

Authors:  R W Powell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Effects of reinforcement history on responding under progressive-ratio schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  S L Cohen; J Pedersen; G G Kinney; J Myers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  14 in total

1.  Assessing reinforcers under progressive schedule requirements.

Authors:  H S Roane; D C Lerman; C M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

2.  On the determinants of induction in responding for sucrose when food pellet reinforcement is upcoming.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Weatherly; Karyn M Plumm; Julia R Smith; William A Roberts
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-11

3.  Contextual control of equivalence-based transformation of functions.

Authors:  Michael Dougher; David R Perkins; David Greenway; Ashton Koons; Carmenne Chiasson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  What 50 years of research tell us about pausing under ratio schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  Henry D Schlinger; Adam Derenne; Alan Baron
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2008

5.  Immediate postsession feeding reduces operant responding in rats.

Authors:  John R Smethells; Andrew T Fox; Jennifer J Andrews; Mark P Reilly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effect of reinforcer magnitude on performance maintained by progressive-ratio schedules.

Authors:  J F Rickard; S Body; Z Zhang; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Reinforcement magnitude: an evaluation of preference and reinforcer efficacy.

Authors:  Nicole M Trosclair-Lasserre; Dorothea C Lerman; Nathan A Call; Laura R Addison; Tiffany Kodak
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008

8.  Revealing Behavioral Learning Deficit Phenotypes Subsequent to In Utero Exposure to Benzo(a)pyrene.

Authors:  Monique M McCallister; Zhu Li; Tongwen Zhang; Aramandla Ramesh; Ryan S Clark; Mark Maguire; Blake Hutsell; M Christopher Newland; Darryl B Hood
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Effect of quinolinic acid-induced lesions of the nucleus accumbens core on performance on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement: implications for inter-temporal choice.

Authors:  G Bezzina; S Body; T H C Cheung; C L Hampson; J F W Deakin; I M Anderson; E Szabadi; C M Bradshaw
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Dissociating the effects of dopamine D2 receptors on effort-based versus value-based decision making using a novel behavioral approach.

Authors:  Matthew R Bailey; Eileen Chun; Elke Schipani; Peter D Balsam; Eleanor H Simpson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.