Literature DB >> 13961496

Punishment of temporally spaced responding.

W C HOLZ, N H AZRIN, R E ULRICH.   

Abstract

The responses of pigeons were maintained by a DRL schedule of food reinforcement. With this schedule, responses were reinforced only when a fixed period of time elapsed without an intervening response. Punishment of all responses reduced the frequency of these responses as a direct function of the punishment intensity. As a consequence of the increased temporal spacing of responses, more reinforcements resulted during punishment. Under progressively higher intensities of punishment, the reinforcement frequency increased to a maximum value and then decreased at the highest intensities. The increased frequency of reinforcement which resulted during punishment did not counteract the suppressive effect of punishment, nor did it lead to a low response rate after punishment was removed. Punishment did not reduce the inter-response time distribution uniformly, but rather especially reduced the number of short inter-response times. Even at the low punishment intensities, the number of short inter-response times was considerably reduced. After punishment was discontinued, performance recovered almost completely after a compensatory burst. The number as well as the temporal pattern of responses returned to normal.

Keywords:  PUNISHMENT; REINFORCEMENT LEARNING

Mesh:

Year:  1963        PMID: 13961496      PMCID: PMC1404223          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  Punishment during fixed-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  N H AZRIN; W C HOLZ
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The effects of deprivation upon temporally spaced responding.

Authors:  D G CONRAD; M SIDMAN; R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Punishment and recovery during fixed-ratio performance.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-10       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A technique for delivering shock to pigeons.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of punishment intensity during variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-04       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  On the selective reinforcement of spaced responses.

Authors:  M P WILSON; F S KELLER
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1953-06

7.  Rate-change effects during a pre-schedule-change stimulus.

Authors:  S PLISKOFF
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total
  22 in total

1.  MOTIVATIONAL ASPECTS OF ESCAPE FROM PUNISHMENT.

Authors:  N H AZRIN; D F HAKE; W C HOLZ; R R HUTCHINSON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  SOME PROPERTIES OF SPACED RESPONDING IN PIGEONS.

Authors:  J E STADDON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  OVERT "MEDIATING" BEHAVIOR DURING TEMPORALLY SPACED RESPONDING.

Authors:  V G LATIES; B WEISS; R L CLARK; M D REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  CONDITIONED PUNISHMENT.

Authors:  D F HAKE; N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Concurrent behavior: are the interpretations mutually exclusive?

Authors:  D O Lyon
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1982

6.  Effects of timeout on spaced responding in pigeons.

Authors:  T J Kramer; M Rilling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Collateral responding during differential reinforcement of low rates.

Authors:  G E Zuriff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Punishment contras during free-operant avoidance.

Authors:  K A Lattal; M A Griffin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Escape and avoidance of shock by pigeons pecking a key.

Authors:  P N Hineline; H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  A comparison of signaled and unsignaled delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  R W Richards
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.