Literature DB >> 14342363

CONDITIONED PUNISHMENT.

D F HAKE, N H AZRIN.   

Abstract

Responses of pigeons were maintained by a VI schedule of food reinforcement. Conditioned punishment was programmed by having these responses concurrently produce an originally neutral stimulus. The effectiveness of this response-contingent stimulus was maintained by infrequent and prearranged stimulus-shock pairings delivered independently of responses. This conditioned punishment procedure reduced the overall response rate as long as the procedure was in effect. The extent and durability of the reduction was a function of the intensity of the shock that was paired with the stimulus. Analysis of the reduction in the overall response rate revealed: (1) a reduction of responses occurring in the absence of the response-contingent stimulus, which was designated as a "punishing" effect, and (2) a reduction of responses during the response-contingent stimulus, which was designated as a "suppressive" effect.

Keywords:  BIRDS; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROSHOCK; EXPERIMENTAL LAB STUDY; PUNISHMENT; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY)

Mesh:

Year:  1965        PMID: 14342363      PMCID: PMC1338095          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  17 in total

1.  The conditioned emotional response as a function of intensity of the US.

Authors:  Z ANNAU; L J KAMIN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1961-08

2.  Punishment in the squirrel monkey Saimiri sciurea.

Authors:  J B APPEL
Journal:  Science       Date:  1961-01-06       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Fixed-ratio punishment.

Authors:  N H AZRIN; W C HOLZ; D F HAKE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Producing either positive or negative tendencies to a stimulus associated with shock.

Authors:  W O EVANS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Secondary reinforcement: a review of recent experimentation.

Authors:  J L MYERS
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1958-09       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  A technique for delivering shock to pigeons.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of punishment intensity during variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-04       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Discriminability and stimulus generalization.

Authors:  N GUTTMAN; H I KALISH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-01

9.  Contiguity vs. drive-reduction in conditioned fear: temporal variations in conditioned and unconditioned stimulus.

Authors:  O H MOWRER; E G AIKEN
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1954-03

10.  Some effects of Two Temporal Variables on Conditioned Suppression.

Authors:  L Stein; M Sidman; J V Brady
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  On the status of knowledge for using punishment implications for treating behavior disorders.

Authors:  Dorothea C Lerman; Christina M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

2.  Behavioral engineering: postural control by a portable operant apparatus.

Authors:  N Azrin; H Rubin; F O'brien; T Ayllon; D Roll
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1968

3.  Shock as punishment in a picture-naming task with retarded children.

Authors:  A S Kircher; J J Pear; G L Martin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1971

4.  Positive conditioned suppression: conditioned suppression using positive reinforcers as the unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  N H Azrin; D F Hake
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of fixed-time shocks and brief stimuli on food-maintained behavior of rats.

Authors:  M Keenan; J C Leslie
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Positive reinforcement and suppression from the same occurrence of the unconditioned stimulus in a positive conditioned suppression procedure.

Authors:  D F Hake; J Powell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Conditioned suppression, punishment, and aversion.

Authors:  D W Orme-Johnson; M Yarczower
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The relative aversiveness of signalled versus unsignalled shock-punishment.

Authors:  L Macdonald
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Patterns of responding within sessions.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J M Hinson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Behavioral engineering: control of posture by informational feedback.

Authors:  F O'brien; N H Azrin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1970
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.