Literature DB >> 16811403

Generalization of conditioned suppression after differential training.

D P Hendry, R Switalski, M Yarczower.   

Abstract

In a modified conditioned suppression procedure, clicks at one frequency (danger signal) preceded shocks, while no shocks followed clicks at a different frequency (safe signal). During generalization tests, the maximal response rate was frequently shifted from the safe signal in the direction away from the danger signal, and the minimal response rate was frequently shifted in the opposite direction, away from the safe signal. There was considerable variability in the results from one animal to another. The generalization tests also suggested different generalization functions according to whether the danger signal was a lower or a higher frequency than the safe signal. The results also showed the development of systematic differences in response rate during and after the safe and danger signals, notably a relatively high rate at the beginning of the safe signal and after the danger signal.

Year:  1969        PMID: 16811403      PMCID: PMC1338683          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  STIMULUS ASPECTS OF AVERSIVE CONTROLS: STIMULUS GENERALIZATION OF CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION FOLLOWING DISCRIMINATION TRAINING.

Authors:  H S HOFFMAN; M FLESHLER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  MAINTAINED GENERALIZATION TESTING OF CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION.

Authors:  E WINOGRAD
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A facilitative effect of punishment on unpunished behavior.

Authors:  D M BRETHOWER; G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  H M HANSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

5.  Generalization of conditioned suppression.

Authors:  O S RAY; L STEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-10       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Discrimination learning, the peak shift, and behavioral contrast.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Contrast, generalization, and the process of discrimination.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The peak shift in stimulus generalization: equivalent effects of errors and noncontingent shock.

Authors:  T Grusec
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Discriminated response and incentive processes in operant conditioning: a two-factor model of stimulus control.

Authors:  S J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Combined-stimulus control as a function of the response rate controlled by the absence of the single stimuli.

Authors:  R A Wiltz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Generalization peak shift in rats under conditions of positive reinforcement and avoidance.

Authors:  S J Weiss; C W Schindler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.