Literature DB >> 1385900

Pedicle diameter determined by computed tomography. Its relevance to pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine.

T N Bernard1, C E Seibert.   

Abstract

Intraoperative technical complications of pedicle screw fixation include screw cutout or maldirection and pedicle fracture. The aims of this study were 1) to use computed tomography to determine the average pedicle diameter; and 2) to compare these measurements with the outer diameter measurements of commonly used pedicle screws. The pedicle diameters of L2, L3, L4, L5, and S1 were measured in 154 adult patients (81 men, 73 women) who had low-back pain. The distance across the isthmus of the pedicle was measured with the distance mode on the axial computed tomographic image in the bone window setting. The lateral computed tomographic scout view was used to select the axial section through the midportion of the pedicle. To standardize data retrieval, the lower four motion segments were denoted as L2-S1, even when there were more or fewer than five lumbar vertebrae. The pedicle diameter at each level was measured and averaged for all patients and for men and women separately. The percentage of pedicles that measured less than 7 mm was determined at each level. The average pedicle diameters were 8.13 mm for L2, 8.7 mm for L3, 10.88 mm for L4, 14.54 mm for L5, and 18.37 mm for S1. Twenty percent of the L2 pedicle diameters, 15.6% of L3, and 1.9% of L4 were less than 7 mm; none of the L5 or S1 pedicles measured less than 7 mm. The outer diameters of the most commonly used pedicle screws range from 5 mm to 7 mm. Screw pitch, tooth profile, outer diameter, and depth of penetration affect implant strength.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1385900     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199206001-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  20 in total

1.  Analysis of lumbar pedicle morphology in degenerative spines using multiplanar reconstruction computed tomography: what can be the reliable index for optimal pedicle screw diameter?

Authors:  Takahiro Makino; Takashi Kaito; Hiroyasu Fujiwara; Kazuo Yonenobu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of radiographic and computed tomographic measurement of pedicle and vertebral body dimensions in Koreans: the ratio of pedicle transverse diameter to vertebral body transverse diameter.

Authors:  Ki Ser Kang; Kwang-Sup Song; Jong Seok Lee; Jae Jun Yang; In Sup Song
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comparative assessment of pedicle morphology of the lumbar spine in various degenerative diseases.

Authors:  Kenya Nojiri; Morio Matsumoto; Kazuhiro Chiba; Yoshiaki Toyama; Suketaka Momoshima
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Complexity of the thoracic spine pedicle anatomy.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; J D O'Holleran; J J Crisco; R Kothe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Reliability of pedicle screw assessment utilizing plain radiographs versus CT reconstruction.

Authors:  U Berlemann; P Heini; U Müller; C Stoupis; O Schwarzenbach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Quantitative dual-energy CT for phantomless evaluation of cancellous bone mineral density of the vertebral pedicle: correlation with pedicle screw pull-out strength.

Authors:  Julian L Wichmann; Christian Booz; Stefan Wesarg; Ralf W Bauer; J Matthias Kerl; Sebastian Fischer; Thomas Lehnert; Thomas J Vogl; M Fawad Khan; Konstantinos Kafchitsas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Head-mounted display augmented reality to guide pedicle screw placement utilizing computed tomography.

Authors:  Jacob T Gibby; Samuel A Swenson; Steve Cvetko; Raj Rao; Ramin Javan
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Analysis of stress induced by screws in the vertebral fixation system.

Authors:  Sarah Fakher Fakhouri; Marcos Massao Shimano; Cleudmar Amaral de Araújo; Helton Luiz Aparecido Defino; Antônio Carlos Shimano
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.513

9.  Vertebral pedicle diameter as determined by computed tomography: inaccuracies observed by direct measurement of cadaveric lumbar spine.

Authors:  K Okuyama; K Sato; E Abe; S Onuma; N Ishikawa
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Lumbar morphometry: a study of lumbar vertebrae from a pakistani population using computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Muhammad M Alam; Muhammad Waqas; Hussain Shallwani; Gohar Javed
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-08-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.