Literature DB >> 15968479

Comparative assessment of pedicle morphology of the lumbar spine in various degenerative diseases.

Kenya Nojiri1, Morio Matsumoto, Kazuhiro Chiba, Yoshiaki Toyama, Suketaka Momoshima.   

Abstract

Measurement of the morphological dimensions of the pedicles of the lumbar spine was conducted using computed tomography (CT) to clarify the difference in pedicle morphology among different lumbar degenerative diseases. The subjects were 136 patients with lumbar spinal disorders who underwent myelography followed by CT scans. They were divided into four groups, that is a group of 25 patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS group), a group of 54 patients with lumbar canal stenosis (LCS group), a group of 42 patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH group), and a control group of 15 patients with spinal cord tumor in cervicothoracic region but without lumbar diseases (control group). Measurements of the transverse diameter, axial length, and axial angle of the pedicles were performed on CT slices obtained at the middle of the pedicle. The transverse diameter was the width of the isthmus, the axial length was the distance between the anterior of the vertebral body and the posterior of the vertebral arch on a line perpendicular to the line bisecting the isthmus, and the axial angle was the angle between the line perpendicular to the line bisecting the isthmus and the midline of the vertebral body. While there were no significant differences in the mean transverse diameter or axial length among the four groups, the mean axial angle was significantly smaller in the DS and LCS groups when compared to that in the LDH and control groups. In the DS and LCS groups, the pedicles were more sagitally oriented than in the LDH and control groups. Such difference in the axial angle of the pedicles in different lumbar diseases should be taken into consideration when placing at the insertion of pedicle screws, because precise orientation of screw insertion would scarcely allow penetration of the pedicle wall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15968479     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-005-0327-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  16 in total

1.  The radiologic anatomy of the lumbar and lumbosacral pedicles.

Authors:  P A Robertson; N R Stewart
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Projection of the lumbar pedicle and its morphometric analysis.

Authors:  N A Ebraheim; J R Rollins; R Xu; R A Yeasting
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Reliability of axial landmarks for pedicle screw placement in the lower lumbar spine.

Authors:  P A Robertson; J E Novotny; L J Grobler; J U Agbai
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Morphometry of the thoracic and lumbar spine related to transpedicular screw placement for surgical spinal fixation.

Authors:  M H Krag; D L Weaver; B D Beynnon; L D Haugh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Vertebral body and posterior element morphology: the normal spine in middle life.

Authors:  P V Scoles; A E Linton; B Latimer; M E Levy; B F Digiovanni
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Vertebral pedicle diameter as determined by computed tomography: inaccuracies observed by direct measurement of cadaveric lumbar spine.

Authors:  K Okuyama; K Sato; E Abe; S Onuma; N Ishikawa
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Pedicle morphology of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine in a Chinese population.

Authors:  S Hou; R Hu; Y Shi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Human lumbar vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; V Goel; T Oxland; K Takata; J Duranceau; M Krag; M Price
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Morphometry of the lumbar spine: anatomical perspectives related to transpedicular fixation.

Authors:  J M Olsewski; E H Simmons; F C Kallen; F C Mendel; C M Severin; D L Berens
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Pedicle diameter determined by computed tomography. Its relevance to pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  T N Bernard; C E Seibert
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  6 in total

1.  Analysis of lumbar pedicle morphology in degenerative spines using multiplanar reconstruction computed tomography: what can be the reliable index for optimal pedicle screw diameter?

Authors:  Takahiro Makino; Takashi Kaito; Hiroyasu Fujiwara; Kazuo Yonenobu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Assessment of the morpho-densitometric parameters of the lumbar pedicles in osteoporotic and control women undergoing routine abdominal MDCT examinations.

Authors:  Antonios E Papadakis; Apostolos H Karantanas; Giorgos Papadokostakis; John Damilakis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Inserting pedicle screws in lumbar spondylolisthesis - The easy bone conserving way.

Authors:  Hitesh Lal; Lalit Kumar; Ramesh Kumar; Tankeshwar Boruah; Pankaj Kumar Jindal; Vinod Kumar Sabharwal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-03-06

4.  In vivo three-dimensional morphometric analysis of the lumbar pedicle isthmus.

Authors:  Keizo Sugisaki; Howard S An; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Richard Rhim; Gunnar B J Andersson; Nozomu Inoue
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Lumbosacral pedicle screw placement using a fluoroscopic pedicle axis view and a cannulated tapping device.

Authors:  Toshitaka Yoshii; Takashi Hirai; Tsuyoshi Yamada; Satoshi Sumiya; Renpei Mastumoto; Tsuyoshi Kato; Mitsuhiro Enomoto; Hiroyuki Inose; Shigenori Kawabata; Kenichi Shinomiya; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Use of an inertial measurement unit sensor in pedicle screw placement improves trajectory accuracy.

Authors:  Satoshi Baba; Kenichi Kawaguchi; Kazuhito Itamoto; Takeshi Watanabe; Mitsumasa Hayashida; Takao Mae; Yasuharu Nakashima; Go Kato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.