Literature DB >> 20803224

Comparison of radiographic and computed tomographic measurement of pedicle and vertebral body dimensions in Koreans: the ratio of pedicle transverse diameter to vertebral body transverse diameter.

Ki Ser Kang1, Kwang-Sup Song, Jong Seok Lee, Jae Jun Yang, In Sup Song.   

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the characteristics of pedicle transverse diameters (PD), vertebral body transverse diameters (VBD), especially the ratios of PD/VBD (CT ratio), which has never been discussed, in Koreans using computed tomography (CT) scans and to evaluate the possibility of obtaining more accurate estimations of PD from plain radiographs using the CT ratios in each spine level. The T1-L5 vertebrae of 50 participants were analyzed prospectively with CT scans (CT-VBD and CT-PD), and the T9-L5 vertebrae of the same participants were investigated with plain radiographs (X-VBD and X-PD). The CT ratio had a higher correlation with the CT-PD (r2 = 0.630) from T1 to L5, especially in the lower thoracic and lumbar spine (T9-L5, r2 = 0.737). The correlation of VBDs between the two radiologic tools (r2 = 0.896) was higher than that of the PDs (r2 = 0.665). Based on the data, equations for the estimation of a more accurate PD from plain radiographs were developed as follows: estimated PD = estimated VBD × [1.014 × (X-VBD) + 0.152] × the mean CT ratio at each spinal level. The correlation between the estimated PD and the CT-PD (r2 = 0.852) was improved compared with that (r2 = 0.665) between the X-PD and the CT-PD. In conclusion, the CT ratio showed a very similar changing trends to CT-PD from T1 to L5 regardless of sex and body mass, and the measurement error of PD from only plain radiographs could be minimized using estimated VBD and the mean CT ratio at each spinal level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20803224      PMCID: PMC3048238          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1560-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  22 in total

1.  Morphometric study of the thoracic vertebral pedicle in an Indian population.

Authors:  Sandeep P Datir; Sajal R Mitra
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Internal fixation for lumbosacral fusion.

Authors:  D KING
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1948-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Development of the lumbar and sacral vertebral canal in utero.

Authors:  T R Ursu; R W Porter; V Navaratnam
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Morphometry of the thoracic and lumbar spine related to transpedicular screw placement for surgical spinal fixation.

Authors:  M H Krag; D L Weaver; B D Beynnon; L D Haugh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Morphometry of lower lumbar vertebrae as seen on CT scans: newly recognized characteristics.

Authors:  J J van Schaik; H Verbiest; F D van Schaik
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Comprehensive literature review. Pedicle screw fixation devices.

Authors:  M A Yahiro
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Pedicle morphology of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine in a Chinese population.

Authors:  S Hou; R Hu; Y Shi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Human lumbar vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; V Goel; T Oxland; K Takata; J Duranceau; M Krag; M Price
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Morphometry of the lumbar spine: anatomical perspectives related to transpedicular fixation.

Authors:  J M Olsewski; E H Simmons; F C Kallen; F C Mendel; C M Severin; D L Berens
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  An internal fixator for posterior application to short segments of the thoracic, lumbar, or lumbosacral spine. Design and testing.

Authors:  M H Krag; B D Beynnon; M H Pope; J W Frymoyer; L D Haugh; D L Weaver
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  5 in total

1.  Morphometry of the lower lumbar intervertebral discs and endplates: comparative analyses of new MRI data with previous findings.

Authors:  Ruoliang Tang; Celal Gungor; Richard F Sesek; Kenneth Bo Foreman; Sean Gallagher; Gerard A Davis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Do the benefits of hook-hybrid construct justify their use over all-pedicle screws constructs in maintaining postoperative curve correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients from an Asian population?

Authors:  Samuel Wei Han Tan; Graham S Goh; Lei Jiang; Reuben Chee Cheong Soh
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-03-08

3.  Lumbar Canal Diameter Evaluation by CT Morphometry-Study of Indian Population.

Authors:  Uttam Yadav; Vivek Singh; Nishant Bhargava; Arun Kumar Srivastav; Zafar Neyaz; R V Phadke; Prabhakar Mishra
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-04-30

4.  Prediction of Incidental Osteoporotic Fractures at Vertebral-Specific Level Using 3D Non-Linear Finite Element Parameters Derived from Routine Abdominal MDCT.

Authors:  Long Yu Yeung; Nithin Manohar Rayudu; Maximilian Löffler; Anjany Sekuboyina; Egon Burian; Nico Sollmann; Michael Dieckmeyer; Tobias Greve; Jan S Kirschke; Karupppasamy Subburaj; Thomas Baum
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-30

5.  Depression of the Thoracolumbar Posterior Vertebral Body on the Estimation of Cement Leakage in Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty Operations.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Pu Jia; Li Bao; Fei Feng; He Yang; Jin-Jun Li; Hai Tang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.