Literature DB >> 25187858

Lumbar morphometry: a study of lumbar vertebrae from a pakistani population using computed tomography scans.

Muhammad M Alam1, Muhammad Waqas1, Hussain Shallwani2, Gohar Javed1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study.
PURPOSE: To describe the characteristics of lumbar vertebrae of Pakistani patients reporting at a tertiary care hospital and compare with studies from other populations. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Several studies have been conducted to determine morphometry of lumbar vertebrae. Most of the studies involve Caucasian populations, still data on other populations still sparse. This is the first study describing lumbar morphometry of a Pakistani population.
METHODS: An observational study was conducted based on a review of thin-cut (3 mm) computed topographic images of lumbar vertebrae. Two-hundred and twenty vertebrae from forty-nine patients were studied, and various dimensions were analyzed.
RESULTS: Generally, the size of the vertebrae, vertebral canals and recesses were found to be greater in male patients. The difference was statistically significant for transverse and anteroposterior diameters of the vertebral bodies and sagittal diameter of pedicles on the left side (p<0.05). Comparison of populations revealed statistically significant differences in pedicle dimensions between Pakistani population and others.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides anatomical knowledge of the lumbar region in a sample population of Pakistan. There were significant differences in various dimensions of lumbar vertebrae between female and male patients. This would prove to be critical for performing a safe operation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbar vertebra; Pakistan; Pakistani population; Vertebral dimensions

Year:  2014        PMID: 25187858      PMCID: PMC4149984          DOI: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.4.421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Spine J        ISSN: 1976-1902


  12 in total

1.  Lumbar pedicle: surgical anatomic evaluation and relationships.

Authors:  A Attar; H C Ugur; A Uz; I Tekdemir; N Egemen; Y Genc
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Posterolateral lumbar and lumbosacral fusion with and without pedicle screw internal fixation.

Authors:  M Bernhardt; D E Swartz; P L Clothiaux; R R Crowell; A A White
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Lower dorsal and lumbar pedicle morphometry in Indian population: a study of four hundred fifty vertebrae.

Authors:  Shankar Acharya; Tsewang Dorje; Abhishek Srivastava
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  [Anatomical study of the vertebral pedicles. Surgical application].

Authors:  G Saillant
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1976-03

5.  Projection of the lumbar pedicle and its morphometric analysis.

Authors:  N A Ebraheim; J R Rollins; R Xu; R A Yeasting
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Anatomic analysis of pedicle cortical and cancellous diameter as related to screw size.

Authors:  G R Misenhimer; R D Peek; L L Wiltse; S L Rothman; E H Widell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A morphometric study of human lumbar and selected thoracic vertebrae.

Authors:  J L Berry; J M Moran; W S Berg; A D Steffee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Morphometry of the lumbar spine: anatomical perspectives related to transpedicular fixation.

Authors:  J M Olsewski; E H Simmons; F C Kallen; F C Mendel; C M Severin; D L Berens
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Morphometric study of the human lumbar spine for operation-workspace specifications.

Authors:  A Wolf; M Shoham; S Michael; R Moshe
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Pedicle diameter determined by computed tomography. Its relevance to pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  T N Bernard; C E Seibert
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  6 in total

1.  Anatomical differences in the bony structure of L5 and L4: A possible classification according to the lateral tilt of the pedicles.

Authors:  Giorgio Cacciola; Giuseppe Anastasi; Salvatore Bertino; Giuseppina Rizzo; Giuseppina Cutroneo; Fabio Trimarchi; Alessandro Pisani; Pietro Cavaliere; Andrea Barbanera; Daniele Bruschetta
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-01-30

2.  Lumbar model generator: a tool for the automated generation of a parametric scalable model of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  C E Lavecchia; D M Espino; K M Moerman; K M Tse; D Robinson; P V S Lee; D E T Shepherd
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Comparison of Applied Anatomy at L4-L5 and L5-S1 in Context of Tubular Decompression for Lumbar Canal Stenosis.

Authors:  Arvind G Kulkarni; Sanjeev Asati
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-12

4.  Lumbar Canal Diameter Evaluation by CT Morphometry-Study of Indian Population.

Authors:  Uttam Yadav; Vivek Singh; Nishant Bhargava; Arun Kumar Srivastav; Zafar Neyaz; R V Phadke; Prabhakar Mishra
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-04-30

5.  Letter to the editor: lumbar morphometry: a study of lumbar vertebrae from a pakistani population using computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Safak Ekinci; Faruk Akyildiz; Kenan Koca; Sebahattin Sari; Serkan Akpancar
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-04-15

6.  Surgical Outcomes for Upper Lumbar Disc Herniations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Murray Echt; Ryan Holland; Wenzhu Mowrey; Phillip Cezayirli; Rafael De la Garza Ramos; Mousa Hamad; Yaroslav Gelfand; Michael Longo; Merritt D Kinon; Vijay Yanamadala; Saad Chaudhary; Samuel K Cho; Reza Yassari
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-08-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.