Literature DB >> 13680315

Lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly: an overview.

Marek Szpalski1, Robert Gunzburg.   

Abstract

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common condition in elderly patients and also one of the most common reasons to perform spinal surgery at an advanced age. Disc degeneration, facet degeneration and hypertrophy, and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy and calcification usually participate in the genesis of a stenotic condition in the elderly. These changes can lead to symptoms by themselves or decompensate a preexisting narrow canal. Although some lesions are more central or more lateral, this classic dichotomy is less present in the elderly patient, in whom the degenerative process usually encroaches both central and lateral pathways. Some less common causes of lumbar spinal stenosis are found in the aging subject, such as Paget's disease. However, it must be stressed that so-called stenotic images (sometimes severe) are present on imaging studies in a great number of symptom-free individuals, and that the relationship between degenerative lesions, importance of abnormal images, and complaints is still unclear. Lumbar stenosis is a very common reason for decompressive surgery and/or fusion. Various conditions can lead to a narrowing of the neural pathways and differential diagnosis with vascular troubles, also common in the elderly, can be challenging. The investigation of stenotic symptoms should be extremely careful and thorough and include a choice of technical examinations including vascular investigations. This is of utmost importance, especially if a surgical sanction is considered to avoid disappointing results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13680315      PMCID: PMC3591819          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-003-0612-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  29 in total

Review 1.  The influence of occupation on lumbar degeneration.

Authors:  T Videman; M C Battié
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Neurologic and neurosurgical sequelae of Paget's disease of bone.

Authors:  H H Schmidek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation.

Authors:  S D Boden; D O Davis; T S Dina; N J Patronas; S W Wiesel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Spinal cord dysfunction in Paget's disease of bone. Has medical treatment a vascular basis?

Authors:  D L Douglas; T Duckworth; J A Kanis; A A Jefferson; T J Martin; R G Russell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1981

5.  The degree of decompressive relief and its relation to clinical outcome in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  A Herno; T Saari; O Suomalainen; O Airaksinen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Clinical and psychofunctional measures of conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  R Gunzburg; T S Keller; M Szpalski; K Vandeputte; K F Spratt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-11-30       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The value of magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine to predict low-back pain in asymptomatic subjects : a seven-year follow-up study.

Authors:  D G Borenstein; J W O'Mara; S D Boden; W C Lauerman; A Jacobson; C Platenberg; D Schellinger; S W Wiesel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Histology of the ligamentum flavum in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  P K Schräder; D Grob; B A Rahn; J Cordey; J Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Computed tomography after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Patients' pain patterns, walking capacity, and subjective disability had no correlation with computed tomography findings.

Authors:  A Herno; O Airaksinen; T Saari
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  [Epidural gas aggregation in the course of gaseous degeneration of lumbar intervertebral disk as a cause of foot paresis].

Authors:  W Kloc; W Wasilewski; B L Imieliński; Z Karwacki
Journal:  Neurol Neurochir Pol       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.621

View more
  42 in total

1.  Lumbar spinal stenosis in a young individual as a result of ligamantum flavum ossification: A case report.

Authors:  Murat Yilmaz; Orhan Kalemci; Hakan Yilmaz; Necdet M Palaz
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2013-05-09

2.  Strategies of spinal fusion on osteoporotic spine.

Authors:  Sung Bae Park; Chun Kee Chung
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-06-30

3.  Cognitive-Behavioral-Based Physical Therapy for Patients With Chronic Pain Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Kristin R Archer; Clinton J Devin; Susan W Vanston; Tatsuki Koyama; Sharon E Phillips; Shannon L Mathis; Steven Z George; Matthew J McGirt; Dan M Spengler; Oran S Aaronson; Joseph S Cheng; Stephen T Wegener
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 5.820

4.  Lumbar microdecompression in elderly versus general adult patients: Comparable outcomes and costs despite group differences.

Authors:  Ziyad O Knio; Samuel Rosas; Michael S Schallmo; Suman Medda; Tadhg J O'Gara
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-09-11

5.  Degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis: intra- and inter-reader agreement for magnetic resonance imaging parameters.

Authors:  Sebastian Winklhofer; Ulrike Held; Jakob M Burgstaller; Tim Finkenstaedt; Nicolae Bolog; Nils Ulrich; Johann Steurer; Gustav Andreisek; Filippo Del Grande
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jon Lurie; Christy Tomkins-Lane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-01-04

7.  Step activity monitoring in lumbar stenosis patients undergoing decompressive surgery.

Authors:  Tobias L Schulte; Tim Schubert; Corinna Winter; Mirko Brandes; Lars Hackenberg; Hansdetlef Wassmann; Dennis Liem; Dieter Rosenbaum; Viola Bullmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography-myelography for quantitative evaluation of lumbar intracanalar cross-section.

Authors:  Hiroyasu Ogura; Kei Miyamoto; Shoji Fukuta; Toshitaka Naganawa; Katsuji Shimizu
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  Comparison of the oswestry disability index and magnetic resonance imaging findings in lumbar canal stenosis: an observational study.

Authors:  Vijay G Goni; Aravind Hampannavar; Nirmal Raj Gopinathan; Paramjeet Singh; Pebam Sudesh; Rajesh Kumar Logithasan; Anurag Sharma; Shashidhar Bk; Radheshyam Sament
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-02-06

10.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: correlation with Oswestry Disability Index and MR imaging.

Authors:  Mustafa Sirvanci; Mona Bhatia; Kursat Ali Ganiyusufoglu; Cihan Duran; Mehmet Tezer; Cagatay Ozturk; Mehmet Aydogan; Azmi Hamzaoglu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.