Literature DB >> 7997932

Computed tomography after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Patients' pain patterns, walking capacity, and subjective disability had no correlation with computed tomography findings.

A Herno1, O Airaksinen, T Saari.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between postoperative computed tomography findings and patients' pain patterns, walking capacity, and subjective disability after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recent improvements in computed tomography have enabled this tool to reveal changes in a patient after an operation, but there is a paucity of comparative examinations regarding the lumbar spinal canal of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
METHODS: Ninety-two patients (42 women, and 50 men) with a mean age of 55 years were operated upon. Mean follow-up time was 3.5 years. Based on computed tomography findings of the operative area, three patient groups were formed: 1) no stenosis, 2) moderate stenosis, 3) and severe stenosis. During treadmill testing, each patient's pain was evaluated by visual analogue scale. The patients were divided into four pain pattern groups: 1) pain in the back and leg, 2) pain in the back only, 3) pain in the leg only, and 4) no pain in the back and leg. Subjective disability was measured by the Oswestry disability score.
RESULTS: The structural changes revealed by computed tomography, and the patients' pain patterns, walking capacity, and subjective disability did not correlate significantly with each other.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative computed tomography has only limited value because asymptomatic and symptomatic patients yield similar findings after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7997932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  19 in total

Review 1.  The conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly.

Authors:  Robert Gunzburg; Marek Szpalski
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The diagnostic value of a treadmill test in predicting lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Thomas Barz; Markus Melloh; Lukas Staub; Christoph Roeder; Jörn Lange; Franz-Georg Smiszek; Jean-Claude Theis; Harry R Merk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A novel method for the quantitative evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Fengyu Zheng; James C Farmer; Harvinder S Sandhu; Patrick F O'Leary
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2006-09

4.  Density of lumbar muscles 4 years after decompressive spinal surgery.

Authors:  O Airaksinen; A Herno; E Kaukanen; T Saari; T Sihvonen; O Suomalainen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Consensus conference on core radiological parameters to describe lumbar stenosis - an initiative for structured reporting.

Authors:  Gustav Andreisek; Richard A Deyo; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Francois Porchet; Sebastian F X Winklhofer; Johann Steurer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Quantification of walking ability in subjects with neurogenic claudication from lumbar spinal stenosis--a comparative study.

Authors:  James Rainville; Lisa A Childs; Enrique B Peña; Pradeep Suri; Janet C Limke; Cristin Jouve; David J Hunter
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 7.  Management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jon Lurie; Christy Tomkins-Lane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-01-04

8.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar spine configuration.

Authors:  J Abbas; K Hamoud; H May; O Hay; B Medlej; Y Masharawi; N Peled; I Hershkovitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly: an overview.

Authors:  Marek Szpalski; Robert Gunzburg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-09       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Comparison of the oswestry disability index and magnetic resonance imaging findings in lumbar canal stenosis: an observational study.

Authors:  Vijay G Goni; Aravind Hampannavar; Nirmal Raj Gopinathan; Paramjeet Singh; Pebam Sudesh; Rajesh Kumar Logithasan; Anurag Sharma; Shashidhar Bk; Radheshyam Sament
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.