Literature DB >> 27334492

Degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis: intra- and inter-reader agreement for magnetic resonance imaging parameters.

Sebastian Winklhofer1,2, Ulrike Held3, Jakob M Burgstaller3, Tim Finkenstaedt4, Nicolae Bolog3, Nils Ulrich5, Johann Steurer3, Gustav Andreisek4, Filippo Del Grande6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the inter- and intra-reader agreement of commonly used quantitative and qualitative image parameters for the assessment of degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
METHODS: In this ethical board approved cross-sectional multicenter study, MRI of 100 randomly selected patients (median age 72.5 years, 48 % female) of the prospective Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS) were evaluated by two independent readers. A set of five previously published core imaging parameters as well as nine qualitative and five quantitative additional parameters regarding LSS and degenerative changes of the lumbar spine were assessed to calculate κ and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for the inter-reader agreement. Additional repeated image evaluations were performed by one reader to calculate the intra-reader agreement.
RESULTS: κ values for the core image parameters ranged between 0.42 (compromise of the foraminal zone) and 0.77 (relation between fluid and cauda equina) for inter-reader agreement and between 0.59 (compromise of the foraminal zone) and 0.8 (compromise of the central zone) for intra-reader agreement. The inter-reader agreement for the non-core parameters showed κ values of 0.27-0.69 and ICC values of 0.46-0.85. The intra-reader agreement showed κ values of 0.53-0.69 and ICC values of 0.81-0.88.
CONCLUSIONS: The inter- and intra-reader agreement of commonly used quantitative and qualitative image parameters for the assessment of LSS showed quite a variability with previously defined core parameters having good to excellent inter- and intra-reader agreements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low back pain; Lumbar; Magnetic resonance imaging; Reproducibility of results; Spinal canal

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27334492     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4667-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  50 in total

1.  Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology.

Authors:  D F Fardon
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Is the sedimentation sign associated with spinal stenosis surgical treatment effect in SPORT?

Authors:  Rachel A Moses; Wenyan Zhao; Lukas P Staub; Markus Melloh; Thomas Barz; Jon D Lurie
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  The adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Lumbar spine: reliability of MR imaging findings.

Authors:  John A Carrino; Jon D Lurie; Anna N A Tosteson; Tor D Tosteson; Eugene J Carragee; Jay Kaiser; Margaret R Grove; Emily Blood; Loretta H Pearson; James N Weinstein; Richard Herzog
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Lumbar spine: agreement in the interpretation of 1.5-T MR images by using the Nordic Modic Consensus Group classification form.

Authors:  Estanislao Arana; Ana Royuela; Francisco M Kovacs; Ana Estremera; Helena Sarasíbar; Guillermo Amengual; Isabel Galarraga; Carmen Martínez; Alfonso Muriel; Víctor Abraira; María Teresa Gil Del Real; Javier Zamora; Carlos Campillo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Constantin Schizas; Nicolas Theumann; Alexandre Burn; Rosamond Tansey; Douglas Wardlaw; Francis W Smith; Gerit Kulik
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Lumbar facet joint osteoarthritis: a review.

Authors:  Leonid Kalichman; David J Hunter
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Lumbosacral epidural lipomatosis: MRI grading.

Authors:  Daniel G Borré; Guillermo E Borré; Flavio Aude; Gladys N Palmieri
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-12-13       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  MR imaging of the lumbar spine: prevalence of intervertebral disk extrusion and sequestration, nerve root compression, end plate abnormalities, and osteoarthritis of the facet joints in asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  D Weishaupt; M Zanetti; J Hodler; N Boos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Imaging the degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  David Malfair; Douglas P Beall
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.266

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Current applications and future directions of deep learning in musculoskeletal radiology.

Authors:  Pauley Chea; Jacob C Mandell
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Challenges Related to Artificial Intelligence Research in Medical Imaging and the Importance of Image Analysis Competitions.

Authors:  Luciano M Prevedello; Safwan S Halabi; George Shih; Carol C Wu; Marc D Kohli; Falgun H Chokshi; Bradley J Erickson; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Katherine P Andriole; Adam E Flanders
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2019-01-30

3.  Texture analysis of paraspinal musculature in MRI of the lumbar spine: analysis of the lumbar stenosis outcome study (LSOS) data.

Authors:  Manoj Mannil; Jakob M Burgstaller; Arjun Thanabalasingam; Sebastian Winklhofer; Michael Betz; Ulrike Held; Roman Guggenberger
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Reliability of standing weight-bearing (0.25T) MR imaging findings and positional changes in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Bjarke B Hansen; Philip Hansen; Anders F Christensen; Charlotte Trampedach; Zoreh Rasti; Henning Bliddal; Mikael Boesen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  External validation of the deep learning system "SpineNet" for grading radiological features of degeneration on MRIs of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Alexandra Grob; Markus Loibl; Amir Jamaludin; Sebastian Winklhofer; Jeremy C T Fairbank; Tamás Fekete; François Porchet; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.721

6.  Can T2-weighted Dixon fat-only images replace T1-weighted images in degenerative disc disease with Modic changes on lumbar spine MRI?

Authors:  Sisi Yang; Louis Lassalle; Ahmed Mekki; Gautier Appert; François Rannou; Christelle Nguyen; Marie-Martine Lefèvre-Colau; Céline Mutschler; Jean-Luc Drapé; Antoine Feydy
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Natural Course and Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations.

Authors:  Mehmet Zileli; Marco Crostelli; Marco Grimaldi; Osvaldo Mazza; Carla Anania; Maurizio Fornari; Francesco Costa
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2020-02-28

8.  Reliability of preoperative MRI findings in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Hasan Banitalebi; Ansgar Espeland; Masoud Anvar; Erland Hermansen; Christian Hellum; Jens Ivar Brox; Tor Åge Myklebust; Kari Indrekvam; Helena Brisby; Clemens Weber; Jørn Aaen; Ivar Magne Austevoll; Oliver Grundnes; Anne Negård
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Effects of calcitonin addition on epidural injection in patients with degenerative spinal canal stenosis: a randomized double blind clinical trial.

Authors:  Poupak Rahimzadeh; Seyed Mani Mahdavi; Kamran Mahmoudi; Hassan Ghandhari; Ali Babashahi; Parvaneh Zandi; Seyed Hamid Reza Faiz
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2021-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.