Literature DB >> 11568190

The value of magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine to predict low-back pain in asymptomatic subjects : a seven-year follow-up study.

D G Borenstein1, J W O'Mara, S D Boden, W C Lauerman, A Jacobson, C Platenberg, D Schellinger, S W Wiesel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 1989, a group of sixty-seven asymptomatic individuals with no history of back pain underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine. Twenty-one subjects (31%) had an identifiable abnormality of a disc or of the spinal canal. In the current study, we investigated whether the findings on the scans of the lumbar spine that had been made in 1989 predicted the development of low-back pain in these asymptomatic subjects.
METHODS: A questionnaire concerning the development and duration of low-back pain over a seven-year period was sent to the sixty-seven asymptomatic individuals from the 1989 study. A total of fifty subjects completed and returned the questionnaire. A repeat magnetic resonance scan was made for thirty-one of these subjects. Two neuroradiologists and one orthopaedic spine surgeon interpreted the original and repeat scans in a blinded fashion, independent of clinical information. At each disc level, any radiographic abnormality, including bulging or degeneration of the disc, was identified. Radiographic progression was defined as increasing severity of an abnormality at a specific disc level or the involvement of additional levels.
RESULTS: Of the fifty subjects who returned the questionnaire, twenty-nine (58%) had no back pain. Low-back pain developed in twenty-one subjects during the seven-year study period. The 1989 scans of these subjects demonstrated normal findings in twelve, a herniated disc in five, stenosis in three, and moderate disc degeneration in one. Eight individuals had radiating leg pain; four of them had had normal findings on the original scans, two had had spinal stenosis, one had had a disc protrusion, and one had had a disc extrusion. In general, repeat magnetic resonance imaging scans revealed a greater frequency of disc herniation, bulging, degeneration, and spinal stenosis than did the original scans.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings on magnetic resonance scans were not predictive of the development or duration of low-back pain. Individuals with the longest duration of low-back pain did not have the greatest degree of anatomical abnormality on the original, 1989 scans. Clinical correlation is essential to determine the importance of abnormalities on magnetic resonance images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11568190     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200109000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  93 in total

1.  The aging of the population: a growing concern for spine care in the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Marek Szpalski; Robert Gunzburg; Christian Mélot; Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Bilateral Pars Defects at the L4 Vertebra Result in Increased Degeneration When Compared With Those at L5: An Anatomic Study.

Authors:  Peter T McCunniff; HoJun Yoo; Anthony Dugarte; Navkirat S Bajwa; Jason O Toy; Uri M Ahn; Nicholas U Ahn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Lumbar disk herniation: are the symptoms relevant for surgery?

Authors:  F Balagué; R Gunzburg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  [Imaging in rheumatology. Degenerative diseases of the spine].

Authors:  J Steinhagen; C R Habermann; J P Petersen; R Kothe; W Rüther
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  Snapshot of degenerative aging of porcine intervertebral disc: a model to unravel the molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Hongsik Cho; Sang Hyug Park; Sangmin Lee; Miji Kang; Karen A Hasty; Song Ja Kim
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 8.718

6.  Structural problems of the spine do not necessarily require intervention.

Authors:  John Hart
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2007-03

Review 7.  Herniated lumbar disc.

Authors:  Jo Jordan; Kika Konstantinou; John O'Dowd
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-03-26

8.  Clinical evaluation of a lumbar interspinous dynamic stabilization device (the Wallis system) with a 13-year mean follow-up.

Authors:  Jacques Sénégas; Jean-Marc Vital; Vincent Pointillart; Paolo Mangione
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Intervertebral discs from spinal nondeformity and deformity patients have different mechanical and matrix properties.

Authors:  Kevin K Cheng; Sigurd H Berven; Serena S Hu; Jeffrey C Lotz
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Computed tomography-evaluated features of spinal degeneration: prevalence, intercorrelation, and association with self-reported low back pain.

Authors:  Leonid Kalichman; David H Kim; Ling Li; Ali Guermazi; David J Hunter
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 4.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.